How is a logical person supposed to reconcile a bill that was meant to help the country deal with an emergency is actually penalizing the companies that stepped up to help and charging them for the extra red tape?
How is a logical person supposed to reconcile a bill that was meant to help the country deal with an emergency is actually penalizing the companies that stepped up to help and charging them for the extra red tape?
“Small businesses who stepped up to fight COVID-19 should be applauded by their government, not taxed for doing so. I’m pleased to announce we have directed FDA to cease enforcement of these arbitrary, surprise user fees. Happy New Year, distilleries, and cheers to you for helping keep us safe!” an HHS spokesman said in a statement provided to The Hill.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/532271-fda-hits-...
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_leaders_of_the_United_St... [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_McConnell
Congress encompasses both the House of Representatives, and the Senate, of which Mitch McConnell is a Senator.
Can he do it on his own? It's it Mcconnell who is rushing these bills through to avoid close scrutiny?
Edit: Ugh, sorry, I know what I just said is a fallacy. I just want to believe that making systemic improvements — getting Congress to operate on a better rule set — would be the thing which gets a person re-elected.
I don't know enough about this provision, but if a large enough distillery (of which I know many who have deep pockets) decides to fight the charge on behalf of other smaller distilleries, it could get struck down.