You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
The article alleges that people don't get paid by these programmes, but fails to account for cases that are settled before they get to adjudication.
I'm struggling to understand the article's figures, especially compared to these: https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/data/index.html
> According to the CDC, from 2006 to 2018 over 3.7 billion doses of covered vaccines were distributed in the U.S. For petitions filed in this time period, 7,565 petitions were adjudicated by the Court, and of those 5,297 were compensated. This means for every 1 million doses of vaccine that were distributed,approximately 1 individual was compensated.
See also the UK scheme: https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment
I'm not against vaccines, but I'm not taking it. I take rather the virus, please.
The more difficult part of the equation is that you could be a carrier of the virus to someone the vaccine did not protect.
Good for you.
It took only two days for Moderna to design the vaccine: https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-designed-coronavirus...
... even less for Pfizer ...: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/the-co-founder-of-b...
... and the vaccinated people are paying the price for it: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/diseas...
Which, as your linked article explains, is because they have better technology - not because they're skipping important steps. The virus had already been fully sequenced, and they don't need to cultivate it.
> ... and the vaccinated people are paying the price for it: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/diseas...
This is just a blog post by a climate change denier. But to address the specific claims in it:
> This is a RNA vaccine never before used
mRNA vaccines have been trialled on humans for rabies, influenza, cytomegalovirus, and Zika, and as early as 2011. A roll out of this scale is new, but "never before used" is too strong of a claim.
> at best vaccines are only 60% effective according to the CDC, which Bill Gates also controls
This seems to be quoting seasonal flu statistics. Seasonal flu is challenging for multiple reasons (including some reasons that wouldn't be a problem for mRNA vaccines, like mutations while the virus is grown in eggs). This figure shouldn't be used as an upper bound for all vaccines - the Pfizer vaccine is believed to be 95% effective after both doses.
> 80% of People Taking Maderna Vaccine Had Significant Side-Effects
They've snuck the word "significant" in here which isn't in the video they're quoting. Most commonly it's just pain/swelling/redness at the injection site.