That’s side-allegation, not what this article is about.
And it’s a debatable one.
And it’s a debatable one.
You stated:
> The central allegation is that a few thousand Xinjiang Muslims were offered employment possibly in exchange for political indoctrination
It's a million, and they were not offered employment. They were "transferred" and forced to work in factories, among other places.
You argue every point, but what do you think should be done?