It's only a matter of time before Substack gets enough pressure from its employees or its payments provider and starts censoring "inappropriate" content.
(The definition of "inappropriate" being "whatever people on Twitter dislike today".)
(The definition of "inappropriate" being "whatever people on Twitter dislike today".)
Substack still likes drama, "In November, an anonymous Substack account published a newsletter titled “vote_pattern_analysis,” with a single, elaborate post claiming election fraud. On Twitter, the link was tagged with a fact-check label. For a time in December, the newsletter became one of the top free publications on Substack.", but I doubt it will descend into reddit territory.
Good one. Kinda similar to third rate marketers become thought leaders when they are on linkedin.