Hacker News Reader

Comment by lostcolony | Hacker News Reader

It would make sense for a third party to require 24 hours minimum, but it seems really weird for -Apple- to be dictating what a third party rental company's minimum rental duration is. I understand it's for the license (i.e., "on this day the one seat license was used by X, on this other day, Y, and all other times by Z"), but that seems kind of arbitrary.

View on HN

It's Apple's new license agreement specifically for "rental" companies like AWS and MacStadium. Apple specifically says that Mac hardware and software licenses must be for a minimum time period of 24 hours, and cannot be shared between customers.

> Apple requires companies lease hardware and software "in its entirety to an individual or organization," ensuring peak performance and a one customer to one machine setup. Lease periods must be 24 consecutive hours and customers need to review and accept licensing terms for all first- and third-party software.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/11/12/apple-outlines-de...

Like I said. It's Apple enforcing it on third parties. Which is really weird. Like if Disney forced minimum rental periods on Blockbuster back in the day.

it's arbitrary but it's more the license for MacOS and not the Mac hardware itself. If you (are able to) flash linux on the Mac, you won't be bound to the MacOS license terms and can rent it out without the consecutive 24 hour minimum, although at that point you might as well just run a graviton2 instance.

I would be super strange and non-intuitive for AWS to impose something like this, they have nothing to gain and a lot to lose (actual customers, image, as people will make fun of them for this silly limitation).

As other posters have said, it's a MacOS license limitation :-(

Reply on news.ycombinator.com