Is this the first practical quantum computer? (D-wave 128 qbit box)
dwavesys.com
dwavesys.com
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/loser-dwave-does...
"D-Wave's system uses a chip with little loops of niobium metal containing Josephson junctions—two superconductors separated by an insulator. When the chip is cooled to very low temperatures, tiny electrical currents flowing around the loops exhibit quantum properties, and you can use the direction to represent the states of a qubit: Counterclockwise represents 0, clockwise represents 1, and current flowing both ways represents a superposition of 0 and 1.
D-Wave's superconducting qubits are not new, and other groups use similar devices. But whereas most groups are trying to build the quantum logic gates from which all computing operations can be derived—an approach known as the gate model—D-Wave has adopted a different approach, called adiabatic quantum computation. Here's the gist: You initialize a collection of qubits to their lowest energy state. You then ever so gently (or adiabatically) turn on interactions between the qubits, thus encoding a quantum algorithm. In the end, the qubits drift to a new lowest-energy state. You then read out the qubits to get the results."
That said, I'm quite impressed that D-Wave is finally bringing out a thingy that actually does something. Reading the Scott Aaronson post elsewhere in this thread it appears that they've finally got around to demonstrating that their thingy really does do stuff that involves quantum mechanics.
They're still way behind their implausible schedule, and their thingy still can't do anything that a classical computer can't do a helluva lot faster and cheaper, but I do congratulate them on having a proper working thingy.
But they need to stop calling this thingy a quantum computer.
Regardless, what D-Wave has is real enough that they are not being laughed at in the circles that matter. I would also say that they aren't doing anything that makes academics who are working on QC devices despair of doing anything useful themselves. I think it's rather unlikely that this device is going to be busting open RSA keys anytime soon.
In short, this is probably not fake or a scam. It's just not quite what the original poster was hoping it was.
http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=639
(And the Nature paper: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v473/n7346/full/nature1...)
haha... those physicists
> As some of you might be aware, I’m a theoretical computer scientist, not a physicist (much less an experimentalist).
Ouch.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8...
They claimed to have a 16-qubit machine then, whereas a recent (May 2) New Yorker article revealed that Oxford's research lab quantum computer is only an 8-qubit machine, and that's in 2011. Yale has built one and it's only 2-qubit.