I don't want to outright dismiss this piece as "argument bait", but it is essentially just a bunch of assertions on what other people should do with virtually no rationale and a bunch of shade thrown around deliberately. Sure, we all like to have a good argument, and C++ is an easy target, but this seems wholly unproductive from the get-go. If there was any intent of convincing others then this isn't how to do it.

I would also like to know who or what the "Orthodox C++ committee" is. A search only gets you this exact gist. Is the author himself the committee? That really doesn't put this piece into a better light.