https://www.theverge.com/2016/6/22/12008286/sony-ps3-linux-o...
There's a reason a lot of open source in recent years have avoided GPL as a plague and opted for BSD or MIT or Apache licenses.
Linux stayed on GPL2 instead of upgrading to GPL3 precisely to allow others freely using Linux in their commercial devices. In other words: they made the intentional choice of making it legally easy to embed Linux in proprietary hardware products (aka. Tivoization, which GPL2 allows but GPL3 forbids)
GPL2 is better for commercialization than GPL3 is. However, BSD, MIT, Apache are much much better than any GPL version, including AGPL.
Chromium uses BSD license and browsers based on Chromium, including Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Opera run everywhere.
BSD is much more prevalent than GPL and software written in BSD-style licenses will carry on into the future as even fewer people will be willing to touch anything GPL.