> Only four papers were rejected because of ethical considerations, after a thorough assessment that included the original technical reviewers, the area chair, the senior area chair and also the program chairs.
Is it possible to read these papers?
Is it possible to read these papers?
I don't entirely agree with this, and some subjects are moving away from this way of working, but it is still very common in computing.
It's interesting that some Neurips workshops are on OpenReview but Neurips itself is not. I've found great value in being able to read the reviews (both as a reviewer and learning how to do good reviews and as writer)