It's not "eye-to-eye" conversation. If you want the other person to feel like they are looking at you, you have to look dead into the camera. But then you miss out on seeing the other person.
It's not "eye-to-eye" conversation. If you want the other person to feel like they are looking at you, you have to look dead into the camera. But then you miss out on seeing the other person.
Errol M0rris used a device with a similar design, called the "Interrotron", so that when he interviewed people, they'd have direct eye contact both with him and the viewers: http://www.errolmorris.com/content/eyecontact/interrotron.ht...
Picture of it here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkottke/1526404040/
This should really make the design clear: http://www.whiterabbitdesigncompany.com/Miscellaneous/images...
All you need besides a screen and webcam is a half-silvered mirror, good lighting and an encasing so that the webcam is in the dark, besides light from straight ahead through the mirror. I've been meaning to make this myself, since I spend hours everyday on video chat, but haven't gotten to it yet.
Video chat fails at providing an emotional connection because of this. It leaves you feeling like you are talking past someone. It's a fundamental problem with the technology that can't really be solved unless we literally put a camera in the middle of the screen.
Article: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/08/apple_files_pa...
Patent: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Se...
[1] http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=6726...
This should be interesting task especially when algorithm does not do this 100% perfect.