How Piracy Made 'Go the Fuck to Sleep' a No. 1 Amazon Best-Seller
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
The same factors that make something inherenty viral or popular will also make something highly pirated. You can't draw causation because they are born from the same factor.
(Just from the excerpt in this article, I sent a link to this book to 3 people this moment.)
I'm not even a parent, but I saw the book on facebook through a friend-with-kids and was howling the entire way through. I preordered a copy on Amazon immediately after finishing reading the book and I bookmarked it for future reference for gifts to new parents. If it wasn't for the book being on facebook, I never would have heard of it and I probably wouldn't have bought it if I only saw the cover or a page or two on Amazon or at a physical bookstore.
But I like books in printed form, so I usually try out reading a 2-3 chapters of the pirated version, then if I like it I'll buy it.
The book in the article also appears to be a nice gift. You obviously can't give pirated PDFs as gifts :)
You were perhaps aiming for a sound-bite, but saying "It works in very few cases" is inaccurate.
[0] http://hypervocal.com/news/2011/update-youtube-musician-evan...
People I know get most of their information digitally, reading books, articles, news, doing research, etc., all via computers, ipads, kindles, etc. It's just an easier way to consume information.
But, a physical book can easily serve as a party favor or a souvenir, of an event or of an idea. If some information is particularly valuable, or moving, or memorable, it's nice to have something to put on your coffee table or shelf. I would guess that the types of books that fit that description, just like Go the Fuck to Sleep does, are going to be the only books that are still profitably printed a decade from now.
That said, a device like Kindle DX could very well replace my printed books someday.
Literally all legal research is done online now, though.
What, specifically, is so difficult about replicating technical references digitally? Is it just the screen/notes aspect? (I bet that is fixed within 2 generations) Layout? Graphics? Is it limited by the reproductions rather than the physical displays?
I'm reading books in my dead time, like the daily commute, and I don't have the luxury to use a notebook. I like marking important paragraphs, or add notes on stuff that was previously defined in former chapters, or add question marks reminding me to do further research online.
And yes, the device has to have a big screen with good resolution, and that screen has to be readable in sunlight. And my problem with E-Ink is that it doesn't come in color (making them useless for reading some topics, like design/photography stuff for example).
Of course, I will be very happy when such technical limitations are removed. And I'll also be very happy that such reading devices are more green, and my reading habits aren't the reason for cutting down forests :)
Some people will. They just like physical books. But I bet most people, in the future, would rather have it stored and available digitally at all times. Especially if they're worried about people seeing "How to be a Man" or "The Ethical Slut" on their bookshelves.
Any book-lover would tell you that reading them books is not only about "consuming information". Otherwise, I would be a little bit skeptical in announcing the death of a cultural item that has been with us for at least 2,000 years.
And I'm not at all announcing the death of books. I agree that some books mean more than just the words they contain. For this reason, I think they'll stick around as souvenirs of events, ideas, places, and people.
But, many books don't represent more than the words they contain, so I don't think people will want physical copies of them. For these reasons, I would guess the staggering majority of books are consumed digitally in 10 years. I wrote more in depth about it here, if you're interested (and I'd love to know why I might be wrong): http://www.ajkesslerblog.com/books-are-souvenirs/
Having a physical book can help someone focus and get in the mood, as well as help them create the enviroment around the book itself as they consume the contents.
An ipad or computer also has other purposes than reading, but a book does not.
Some people can do this with an ipad or a computer monitor, but I think the people who say there's no replacing a good book might prefer the in-part ritual around reading an actual book.
[edit] You might be right in that people will eventually create these things around their ipad, but I still think there might be a value in, even if not more valuable than having grep for a book, the single-purpose existence of books.
I don't think you're necessarily wrong, maybe is just that us, "book-fetishists", are a dying species :)
Reading your post I thought a little harder about why I wouldn't like physical books to go away, or to be transformed into "souvenirs" (which I think it's pretty much the same as them books going away).
First, like I said, maybe I'm just a "book-fetishist". It's very hard to explain, Borges explained it best when he said that he hopes "Heaven is a library".
Second, and I saw that you wrote about that in your blog post, books do indeed "represent things, places, times, events or ideas to certain people". I know it happens to me very often to just sit in my couch and look through the titles of the books I've accumulated in my personal library. Half of them I haven't even read, but just reading their titles gives you a special feeling.
Last and not least, I still continue to believe that my interest in reading was very much nurtured by me growing in a small apartment filled up with the books that my dad had bought. I kind of hope that my unborn child will inherit the same passion, just because s/he would grow up in a house surrounded by books.
For parents on HN, if you haven't seen the book, you should. It'll make you laugh when you're having one of those nights.
For example An Awesome Book (http://veryawesomeworld.com/), a similar adult/everyone children's book is offered for free and in full on the website while still quickly selling out on Amazon.
Also, you're not going to sit down with your baby and read them a bedtime story from your laptop.
No, but from your iPad.
Correlation does not imply causation, etc...
No, it wouldn't.