> After all, lead poisoning was suggested as one of the possible reasons for the decline of the Roman empire.
What are you trying to imply here? Microplastic -> Low Testorone -> Socialist government -> Decline of civilisation?
> After all, lead poisoning was suggested as one of the possible reasons for the decline of the Roman empire.
What are you trying to imply here? Microplastic -> Low Testorone -> Socialist government -> Decline of civilisation?
Now, there's obviously many benefits that may also be seen with a less aggressive or even less competitive population, but the basic principle doesn't seem insane here, it seems a bit of a stretch and requires some serious leaps that I'm not sure are remotely proven though...
The studies involved have a number of confounding factors, and notably the use of clinical manipulation of testosterone levels fails to find consistent effect.
I'm not sure how this accurate description of the entire history of human society is supposed to refute their hypothesis?