Given the recent accusations levered against foreign powers for amplifying fake news in the US, I can’t help but wonder if this story has similarly sinister origins.
8/750,000 = 0.00106%
Only X amount of Y population feel the consequences of contracting C19. Most of us have been perfectly fine. So what is your point?
M (where M is very small) out of N (where N is very large) people have experienced an allergic reaction due to the vaccine (allergic reactions can be bad, but are generally manageable).
X (where is is somewhat small) out of Y (where N is not super large) have died contracting C19.
Another Z (which is small, but not as small as X) out of Y are facing long term consequences contracting C19 (and these consequences are more severe than an allergic reaction in many cases).
So, which one is the intellectually disingenuous argument?
I’m revolted to find that here when I expect to find this shit on /r/news.
Supporting a piece of information only when it aligns with your views and opinions is not very rational and objective, is it? It's playing double-standards or just being a hypocrite.
To say that this should be disregarded because it only affects a small amount of people is like saying C19 should be disregarded because it only affects a small amount of people. I guess drawing parallels doesn't work well with majority.