This is one of the key graphics: https://i0.wp.com/particlebites.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/...
This is one of the key graphics: https://i0.wp.com/particlebites.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/...
You need ten times the mass of Mt. Everest in e=mc^2 energy (i.e. 100% efficiency) per 1 kg of mass to get to Andromeda at 1g acceleration/deceleration. [0]
For this reason I sincerely hope that conservation of mass/energy is not necessarily true. Nothing says it needs to be true other than that it empirically seems to be the case, and there is no known process that violates it, other than the Big Bang itself. If it can be violated, we have hope for the long long long term future.
Scary to think about this stuff.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergalactic_travel
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future
I mean, it's bleak perspective, but surely if we all write to our congressperson we can act now to prevent the heat death of the universe, right?
(1) https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-...
Btw, Andromeda will collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years, so at least we won't need ten times the mass of Mt. Everest to get there...
Unless the answer has changed in the last several years, no, the consensus is that it's expanding too fast and has too little mass (and thus gravity) to collapse again.
(Disclaimer: not even an amateur at this, at least not for 40 years.)
So given ungodly eons of time (googleplex ^ googleplex * graham's number, etc. of years) something with a very, very, very low probability becomes inevitable.