You can't be serious.
Are you insinuating it has nothing to do with executive wages ballooning (CEO compensation growing nearly 1,000% since the 1970's) and is instead because women are working?
Are you insinuating it has nothing to do with executive wages ballooning (CEO compensation growing nearly 1,000% since the 1970's) and is instead because women are working?
For example Tim Cook earns 133M/yr which is $976 per employee. ... and this probably massively overstates the figure due to contractors.
Or Sundar Pichai with $86M/yr which is $676 per employee (again... not counting contractors).
Obviously it's more if you include more executives, but the number of top executive companies is basically a constant and at large companies it still ends up being not very large per employee.
This isn't to say that it isn't a concern but I don't see how to justify the belief that the executive compensation at large companies is a major factor in the overall wage market.
Its US women vs the global S&P list, but it is interesting to compare, now that you mention it.
[1]https://aflcio.org/paywatch
[2]https://www.catalyst.org/research/womens-earnings-the-pay-ga....
[3]https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-uni....
That is $7 billion to CEOs vs $3.5 Trillion for women.