Not related to the article. But can anyone shed light on why every other article I see starts with "an oral history of"? If it is written isn't it no longer oral history.
That's a lot different from what the Oral History Association describes in its principles and best practices, where the focus is on preserving sound recordings of interviews:
https://www.oralhistory.org/about/principles-and-practices-r...
“This one weird trick you can only use at BB&B”
“10 things you can do with a BB&B coupon. Number 8 will amaze you”
“BB&B managers hate him”
“BB&B coupons considered harmful”
“BB&B coupons are an anti-pattern”
“BB&B coupons now available on npm”
“BB&B coupons with Tensor Flow”
“CSS-only BB&B coupons”
“BB&B coupons in 6 lines of JavaScript”
“Paul Graham on BB&B coupons”
“BB&B coupons using an ESP8266”