Scientists looking for aliens investigate radio beam from nearby star
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Also, class M star:
>In 2017, Nasa scientists used computer models to show that if Proxima b had an Earth-like atmosphere, it could easily be stripped away by the intense radiation and solar flares unleashed by its parent star. Under this battering, the 4bn-year-old planet could have lost its entire atmosphere in 100m years.
Yep. They burn the longest, but they don't burn cleanly. They "sputter", unleashing huge flares that can erode atmospheres, and their luminosities can fluctuate randomly. Imagine if the Earth was plunged into a 13-year-long superwinter because the Sun decided to be a bit less bright for a while.
(In the Three Body Problem books, a planet there has wild climatic instability owing to the chaotic orbit around Alpha Centauri's three stars.)
I don't think the researchers are necessarily suggesting an alien origin (honestly, shame on them if they are). It's more likely sensationalist reporting. It's almost certainly natural in origin.
[1]: https://www.britannica.com/place/Jupiter-planet/The-auroras
But Jupiter emitting radio waves is really not relevant here. The signal they saw is a very arrow frequency, which pretty strongly indicates a technological origin. See [1] for a better overview of the situation.
[1] https://sites.psu.edu/astrowright/2020/12/20/blc1-a-candidat...
The UFO crowd is going to have a field day with that quote.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabby%27s_Star
https://sites.psu.edu/astrowright/2015/10/15/kic-8462852wher...
“If there is intelligent life there, it would almost certainly have spread much more widely across the galaxy. The chances of the only two civilisations in the entire galaxy happening to be neighbours, among 400bn stars, absolutely stretches the bounds of rationality.”
If there are 2 alien civilisations in our galaxy surely it's equally likely they are next to each other or some arbitrary distance.
I think this is dependent on the conditions by which one or more related lifeforms emerged. It's entirely possible life here came from there or from there to here and the reason it's here and there is because it's close. Chances assuming no travel between the two places is just silly.
If so, why should we be surprised that we detect those signals which are easier to detect before those which are more difficult to detect?