Super Wood (2018)
scientificamerican.com
scientificamerican.com
About 360 million years ago, there was something called the Carboniferous Period[1]. This was the 60 million year period after wood had evolved, but before anything had figured out how to eat it. Trees just piled up and piled up over the millennia sucking out a ton of carbon from the air and leaving an insanely high oxygen ratio, which lead to the evolution of large, high energy creatures with crazy high metabolisms that wouldn't be sustainable with modern oxygen ratios.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboniferous
I love the idea of kicking off a second carboniferous period as we finally realize how to fully utilize the power of wood, and start treating it more like programmable diamond, sucking in the carbon from the air around it, and growing into incredibly strong shapes for any purpose.
IMO if we ever want to start taking sequestration via this method seriously it's trivial to start now - Grow fast trees(e.g. Maple, Pine). Log trees. Bury trees deep underground. Repeat. All the tech exists, is ubiquitous, and trivially easy to de-carbonize in itself. The major sticking point, I'd argue the solitary issue, is there's no money to be made in it.
This makes me think of Lothlórien[0], the living bridges[1], or grown furniture[3].
[0] https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3b/00/fa/3b00fa449cf206aebf6a...
[1] https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/adventure/2019/11/livin...
[2] https://www.creativespotting.com/2016/03/man-grows-natural-c...
I'm not an expert, but as far as I know existing densified wood is basically stronger by virtue of cramming more material closer together - the wood fibers themselves don't change mechanical properties at all, there's just more of them in a given area. So your strength increases are paired with an increase mass as well. If this actually increased the strength of the wood fibers, that would be interesting.
It's an interesting technique, but we already have processed wood products that offer significant strength gains over natural lumber [2], and they haven't displaced regular wood all that much. Normal sawn lumber is often strong enough, and it's just incredibly inexpensive. So it's unclear how much difference another stronger, processed wood product would make to the building market (I can't speak to other uses like body armor or vehicles).
I think long term, the most potential for wood improvement lies with improved trees that grow stronger, faster, and with fewer natural defects. Most agricultural products have been deliberately bred for desirable traits for thousands of years, but we've only just begun to do this with trees. (I wrote more about this here: https://constructionphysics.substack.com/p/stronger-faster-c... )
(Source: structural engineer, formerly worked at a mass-timber focused construction startup).
[1] - https://www.roechling-industrial.com/us/products/composites/... [2] - https://www.mjbwood.com/lsl-lumber/#:~:text=LSL%20Lumber%20(....
I've been wanting to get some to work with but it's special order. Apparently this process is reasonably available now as one of the mills in Marin produces it. Unfortunately decking, eg. boards 1" think or less, seem to be the only kinds available. At least at the retail level.
https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/news/new-densified-wood-...
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1H-323d838 [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=880a_XgvBEo
This is currently the largest timber building in the US [3], and they've announced they're building more.
I imagine this is going to become booming business.
[1] https://atlanta.curbed.com/2020/3/19/21186363/facebook-atlan...
[2] https://www.ajc.com/business/real-estate/midtown-wood-frame-...
This is pretty great for carbon sequestration.
... but then I remember how they don't build wooden houses in Palestine :-(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian-African_Rift_Valley
we have very-minor earthquakes occasionally, and I think a major earthquake once a century or so.
Palestine is not only without forests but semi-embargoed; it looks from the news footage that cement block or hollow brick are common.
In the far past, stone was common; and indeed, today it's cement and hollow bricks. Both in the 1948-occupied parts (= Israel) and the 1967-occupied parts.
Specifically, will this material feel like plastic rather than wood? Behave like plastic rather than wood?
Here's an 18-story one: https://www.dezeen.com/2019/03/19/mjostarne-worlds-tallest-t...
And there's a 12-story one in Portland: https://www.archpaper.com/2017/06/framework-portland-timber-...
No need for densified wood to build midrises, structured timber products like CLT (basically, fancier plywood) are already being used to construct 5 - 10 story buildings with the tallest wooden skyscrapers being planned at 20 - 70 stories tall: https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/wooden-skyscraper-revo...
https://news.ubc.ca/2016/09/15/structure-of-ubcs-tall-wood-b...
There is a convention of putting the year of origin in the title, though, which this submitter didn't do. Moderators will occasionally add it to a title, if they see it.