Your comment used vague, sweeping terminology that would give the passerby reader excuses not to give a shit.
So,
What vague, sweeping terminology did I use? I specifically talked about PRISM, described how Greenwald's description of PRISM was ludicrously wrong, and noted that Greenwald didn't mention PRISM at all in this article and has never issued a correction for his PRISM reporting. Those are highly descriptive, highly specific statements.