Lonely people's brains are different due to excess of imaginary social contact
psychnewsdaily.com
psychnewsdaily.com
I delineate my introvert / extrovert brain by classifying people I deem "interesting enough to talk to" and "people I'd rather not talk to". For this reason, work interactions always seem to go better than off hand social interactions. If someone is condescending or rude then I'd just rather not waste time talking to them. At this point in my life I don't really feel it's worth the effort to force social interaction in either direction, some people like you others won't - dating also gets easier if you take this approach.
Something I'm curious of is if "lonely" brains are less healthy? Also, for reference - the best point of comparison for social anxiety in my case is analogous to why I don't see the point in fancy cars. I drive a 2001 nissan, but I never worry about where I park it, if it gets dented or worry about someone keying it. If I drove a lambo, I'd constantly be worried (even subconsciously) about this kind of thing.
I used to be recluse, then had a social epiphany, temporarily .. so I'm now oddly situated because I remember the need and joy of social bond a bit but I'm back to hyperanxious social mode. Which means I tend to go back to walking alone because it's so lighter.
One anecdote, 10 years ago, I went to a birthday party, a time where I hated social gatherings pretty much. Yet the day after I felt 'replenished' of somethings. As if my internal world couldn't satisfy me fully and even dreaded parties were benefitial.
I think there is a sort of critical mass effect with friends. when I only have one or two, I have to try really hard to make a third. once I hit a certain number of friends with overlapping circles of their own, it's easy to make new friends whenever I want. but then it starts snowballing fast and suddenly I find myself in a deluge of messages and invitations that I don't want. I'd love to be able to hover in that sweet spot, but I don't know how to make that happen.
Just get comfortable saying no without explaining yourself. The fact is that your calendar should not have public read-only permissions, which is the way you're behaving when you feel obligated to justify a declination of an invitation.
It's possible to say no for no reason at all without being rude or discouraging: "Thanks for the invite — can't tonight. Raincheck?". If you really like the person and want to develop more intimacy, you can be even more transparent, "I'd love to, but I'm over-socialized this week. Gonna chill tonight. Have fun!"
The fact is that we LOVE IT when others set and maintain healthy boundaries. It removes ambiguity from the relationship, which makes it easier to feel comfortable in. It also sets an example that the other can follow without fear of alienating you. There's also the side effect of giving people the impression that your presence is precious commodity, and should be valued—which it should be!
Being a well-connected introvert can be fun and easy ;P
I'm the same way towards social gatherings. As a result, I try to remind myself before going to one that I may hate that feeling of dread leading up to it, but that on the other side of it I am going to feel great. That doesn't mean I can be social all the time, but I think even introverts need that regular dose of social activity to feel whole. If anything, it makes those alone times we enjoy even more valuable as there's a contrast.
There’s also a concept of mixed introvert/extrovert, and more to my liking a concept of introversion not being antisocial but craving certain intimate kinds of social experiences.
I thrive on a very small, somewhat malleable but always close social world. All other social demands are conditional on my ability and comfort. But my close social world can come call or (metaphorically during pandemic) hug or snuggle any time
As an introvert, forcing yourself to endure greater efforts of socialization reduces social anxiety, and ironically, makes life as an introvert easier as you no longer live in one of the extremes: you like to be alone, but you're not afraid to be with people.
As with leg day, if you don't use it, you lose it. This lock down has made hermits of some introverts, it takes effort to stay socially fit.
If you ever want to step up a little without sacrificing the "I don't care if it gets keyed", consider a late-model Hyundai. They're actually quite nice. And you will never care what happens to it.
Of the people I've known with fancy cars, that group would be a minority versus those who want you to know they are rich (even if they're not that rich!). Many people buy the badge/appearance AFAICT, and don't care about handling or other factors.
I don't really know the statistics on it.
However, I'd still be weary of my new 4x4 Mercedes Sprinter Van being scratched and I only paid $45k for that new. However, there are benefits to parking in a secured garage in manhattan haha.
Much less.
The dealers make most of their profit on the financing. If you walk in and let them know you won't be borrowing any money they treat you like shit. This and other things (registration period = we have your cash, you don't have the title) are why I don't buy cars from dealers.
Er, no. They need to make a profit. If they don't get some profit kicked back from the bank as part of the financing package they need to raise the purchase price in order to preserve that level of profit.
You can't buy a car for the "financed price" without financing. You have to pay the higher "cash price". The whole "bargaining and negotiating" dance that car dealers do is simply to hide the fact that there are two different prices.
You seem like you write pretty well - have you thought about blogging/twitter as an alternative to sifting through people at meetups in person? I've found it to be much more natural and easier as well.
*edit, +write
I imagine it considerably harder (not impossible!) to convert anonymous blog posts into contracts/job leads, compared with something that has your name and work history attached.
Of course, I'm not ignoring the very real potential downsides and repercussions to writing online about politics, religion, drugs, etc - but based on your posting history here your interests would do plenty fine on a general purpose blog.
If I'm ever able to transition to contracting or living off of my endeavors full time I'd write under my true name. Unfortunately, I'm still a white collar wage slave.
Wishing you luck with writing in whatever form feels most comfortable!
Stalker / Solaris director Andrei Tarkovsky's advice to young people and being alone (video):
https://www.openculture.com/2015/03/andrei-tarkovskys-messag...
I don’t know… I think I’d like to say only that they should learn to be alone and try to spend as much time as possible by themselves. I think one of the faults of young people today is that they try to come together around events that are noisy, almost aggressive at times. This desire to be together in order to not feel alone is an unfortunate symptom, in my opinion. Every person needs to learn from childhood how to spend time with oneself. That doesn’t mean he should be lonely, but that he shouldn’t grow bored with himself because people who grow bored in their own company seem to me in danger, from a self-esteem point of view.
Many felt, many times, totally alone and alienated in a group of friends.
"Lonely people have been found, for example, to focus more on internal thoughts, perhaps to compensate for their lack of actual social experiences."
Well, for me, I daydream and live in my head a lot but I don't think I've ever really felt lonely in the last 10 years at least. So my brain probably looks like this but I would've responded to their survey with "not lonely". Maybe from their point of view I've been coping so long I don't even realise it?
I think a better study would have segmented out people who have limited social contact but don't feel lonely.
Post-apocalyptic movies with a small cast have a strange appeal to me, like it's the ideal small unit of society. We sort of got to experience that earlier this year in Sydney, with few cars on the road, no one walking around outside, and times when I didn't leave the house for days on end except to walk the dog. It was bliss. I had my dog and my wife and a few people on chat, and that's all I needed.
Good social skills are essential to managing a team. It's less a "hack" than just a standard characteristic people hire for.
My big thoughts are mostly the same, moving in the same rate when I'm cooking them up by myself but now in social situations I feel like I can crack some great jokes and mental maneuvers in trying to translate my philosophies to others.
I think being a true loner brings peace in that you don't need to think much about social pressures and such, on another hand though, it can feel a bit like you're some virtual computing machine entity isolated from everything else. Now I'm sort of looking at mental & physical exertion as a way to distract me from the boredom of 'not existing', maybe it was always that and I've been good at it, took skateboarding at 27, practicing by myself like some crazy person 6 years already, and now I started working on a game project too.. It's just weird to me how self-exertion and 'social fasting' go together. But anyway, I've exhausted so many interests already that I sort of crave of breaking off of it, I'd just take some 5 or 6 projects with me and that's it.
Everyone in a group falls into patterns, roles. The same jokes get told, or variations there-of. You do the same thing every year. BBQ for Bob's birthday. Jill hosts a cheese/wine night a couple of times over winter. The geekier sub-group all gather to watch the first few episodes of the new marvel series. Everyone gets together for a picnic in woolaton park on the first or second sunny weekend of sunmer.
Occasionally something new gets thrown in, and if everyone likes it, it becomes the 'new' regular thing. Or something gets dropped due to changes in life or circumstances. No more games nights till 2am now 80% of my male friends have kids. No more Saturday night clubbing in the cookie club after we left our 20s.
If you want to keep doing unpredictable things, you really have to meet someone who's extremely hyper/exhausting, or keep joing new social groups (by meetups, etc.). And of course, they become predictable too, by their very nature being a scheduled meetup about a specific thing.
And it's worth it. Personally I feel the best experience in life is laughing so hard you end up crying while chatting with your friends.
I've read that one from HN it's been 4 years at least I think
I also believe humans are social animals, but really actually most of what society or civilization pretends to be is bullshit to me, but I think when you dig there's always more to it to discover and etc(+sometimes you appear to have found gold ie.: epiphanies), the thing isn't maybe that you'd want to interact with it on your terms instead of doing the play along game? I was never the play along type but for example lately a big topic of interest to me has been language, culture and communication.. I don't know I just like getting stuff from the root. But anyway your take might be completely different.
Yeah... You're not the subject of that article.
I divorced and didn't bother looking for a new partner. I stopped going to weddings and birthdays and other social events that had always stressed me out. I didn't become a hermit - I still go out to events that interest me and happily engage with strangers, I'm not worried about interacting with colleagues or customers in a work environment. The difference is that now social interactions are on my own terms, there isn't any pressure to appear or to perform in situations that I'm not interested in or that I have no contractual obligation to fulfill. It's let a massive weight off my shoulders and given me a much more positive outlook on life. I don't take any mood medication any more, I don't see a psychologist, my emotional health is so much better.
I've often wondered if this means I am an introvert. I don't hate other people - on the contrary, I always try to be kind and respectful, and I try to see the humanity in people, even those who hold different views to me. I care a lot about society and the future of our species and our planet. I just don't feel a need to have social interactions in these tight-knit groups, having realized that they were the source of pretty much all my emotional struggles.
One thing I do think is important to note is that this is somewhat of a privileged position to be in - things would be much harder for me if I were in a position where I needed to depend on familial or tribal support for survival. The longer I live like this, and meet other people who feel the same way, the more I've become convinced that a universal basic income is important, since it liberates people from having to be involved in social structures that might be harming their mental health. On the other hand, would deemphasizing family in a broader scale cause more loneliness in society? The article suggests lonely people are at higher risk of dementia, so is this actually a bad direction for society to take? It's interesting.
I don't think whether one is an introvert necessarily has anything to do with whether one is kind and respectful. While being kind certainly seems like a beneficial thing if you're an extrovert, it doesn't seem quite necessary, and on the flip side preferring a quiet room doesn't mean one can't be kind.
At least, I feel the same as you in that I'm certainly not one to do lots of partying (ignoring the special case of 2020), but I always try to be kind, helpful, etc. I'm not sure I can find myself in your story about emotional struggles, but that might just be my young age.
> One thing I do think is important to note is that this is somewhat of a privileged position to be in
Agree completely, there are various advantages to being wealthy enough to make your own choices about how to organise your life. This amount of wealth does not even necessarily mean "being rich", though in a sense we in that position are definitely rich (both money and other things), even if there are people far richer in terms of monetary value. And those "various advantages" can wind up being more than one may think, both those in the position of wealth and those not in that position.
I think the most basic and least-controversial definition is that introverts feel the need to "recharge" after a period of socializing whereas extroverts want an encore.
It's entirely possible to be introverted and also gregarious, outgoing, etc... It just means you need more breaks.
Also, the most common definition people seem to be using is whether they feel social anxiety and whether or not they think someone else does. Though it’s kinda bring-your-own; the person above wonders if introverts hate people thus maybe they aren’t because they don’t hate people.
The words never clarify discussion. We should drop them and just say what we mean.
In my original post I was perhaps falling a bit for a stereotype that introverts are also misanthropic. A more accurate description for me would be that I generally feel more at peace when I am picking my own path through life and don't have any close or intimate relationships interfering with that. I'm not sure it's social events per se that bring me stress, it's more the sense that I am obliged or expected to perform that causes me anxiety.
What's still an interesting question for me is whether the sorts of negative health effects that - according to the article - are correlated with loneliness also happen to people who make a conscious choice to live more independent lifestyles. Is it physical isolation that causes these problems, or does it also happen to people who do superficially socialize in public but generally do so alone? Or are neither of these things a problem, only loneliness is a problem?
I sort of wonder if I'm giving something up by basically giving up on dating - but I've reached a very warm peace with it all as of late.
If you do have plenty of wealth to spare, maybe you don't worry about dents. Just tell your people that you spotted a dent, and they'll get the car fixed or replaced.
Being nervous about dents isn't great for displaying wealth. It's better to park on a busy street in San Francisco, right next to a tent city where people have set up shop selling car parts. That shows everybody you don't worry about the money.
"Own one car for show and another car for dough."
;)
Use an Agency? Then you only have to network with a few people, while they deal with the larger client base.
Since you don’t seem to have a problem with spending time alone, you are not lonely and the purported* results of this study don’t apply to you.
*I am skeptical of this study’s validity but that is irrelevant to what constitutes ‘loneliness’.
Not entirely though. Part of it can be self-dellusion, and the persons can still feel worse off for being alone even if introverted, but not consciously be able to process it. Humans are social animals, introversion can be part of a development issue (like being on the spectrum).
i am not interested in company, or sex. i really really really prefer to be alone, and mostly am. i live in a place i can hike 3-4 hours a day, i don't have close neighbors, i work from home.
so, honestly and without sarcasm you would say i'm delusional? i personally have never met anyone as happy as me. maybe i am delusional. :)
The intensity seems to vary based on my mood and wether I'm alone. I went on a week long roadtrip with some friends, and realised after a day or two that I wasn't thinking nearly as much. It was as if I couldn't. Even if I wasn't with them for a few hours. My regular dark hole of "I'll just work for 50 years and then die alone" was not accessible, even if I tried.
I've also had almost the same exact feeling when on a pretty strong acid trip, not being able to hear my inner monologue. That time it was more scary, but also really interesting and relaxing. Microdosing LSD brought most of that feeling back (not sure if placebo though), making me more focused and less sad.
I'm guessing getting to that state is a part of what mediation is all about, but I haven't really figured that out yet.
Will you have linguistically formulated sentences "coming to you" without pause?
I can think without formulating sentences in my head, but that's atypical for me. I'll even 'argue' in my head to help me make decisions!
I've never been in a situation where I couldn't use my inner voice, thought.
Notably, when I'm my loosest and "most authentic" socially, it just feels like the inner voice is speaking directly out, whereas most times it's more like the inner voice is giving instructions to a much less verbose underling.
That was totally impossible to do. I could speak those things out aloud, but I couldn't really do them inside my head. If someone asked me a question, I couldn't prepare an answer in my mind before speaking. And those existentially depressing places my thoguths sometimes goes to were also not accessible.
I expressed it to those around me as "I can't think", which was obviously not completely true, but I think I was so focused/grounded in the pretty overwhelming experience that my mind couldn't really waste CPU cycles on wandering or evaluating what the best answer was to a question.
I’ve had a bit of a different experience on psychedelics though. They’ve tended to explode those fears but vomit them up in a way that makes me reflect on them that I would normally subconsciously suppress. Not a very pleasant experience, but incredibly interesting, but due to other side effects I rarely try it.
Even when I’m not actively doing this, my thoughts take the form of conversations.
I wouldn't say her inner dialogue is centered reminiscing or longing, which is what the article mentions in this study about those who are lonely; more so she's constantly running a post mortem on every social interaction she remembers to build a more robust "model" about how people work.
Before she was diagnosed, this tended to veer more towards paranoia and constant second guessing of herself, and often resulted in a feeling of loneliness.
Post diagnosis she is much more comfortable with these thoughts, and has used mindfulness practice as a means to stop herself from obsessing when it goes a little too far.
The thing that has helped me most with this kind of persistent rumination is to vocalise it out loud. I just use the recorder app on my phone as a "rubber duck". I say something out loud, and it's like it's been cleared out. I didn't need to address another person. Then when I do have the conversation, I'm in control of myself: the topics I bring up are more deliberate and purposeful, because I don't have a backlog to clear, and I often have my ideas prepared in articulated form, so I am a more engaging conversation partner.
I am not sure what changed and I became this way. I didn't work towards it or strive for it, I just grew older I guess. So I came up with a theory. Not even a theory, more like an opinion...
That when we are younger we rely on society to survive. Without a support cycle, the elements will overtake us, and our animalistic instincts light up. Our identity is tied to our social circle. But as we get more confident and more comfortable with who we are, that deep fear of loneliness decreases. I am more alone now but less lonely.
Maybe I'll try again in my thirties.
10/10 will do it again ;)
It was a little nervewracking and spooky even though in truth I was only about a twenty minute drive from the edge of the park and civilization. To know that if I slipped and broke a leg or something I'd be screwed for a couple of days until a crew could find me.
But I experienced it as a good kind of anxiety. I deliberately wanted to get outside of my comfort zone and spend a little time getting comfortable with being uncomfortable. It was an absolutely rewarding experience and one of the highlights of 2020 for me. I woke up the next morning refreshed, centered, and excited to return home to my family.
A quote I think about a lot is J. A. Shedd's, "A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for."
Get an EPIRB.
Just make sure you get one that uses 406Mhz rather than two-way LEO satellites. The two-way stuff requires monthly payments and is far less reliable, won't get through forest canopy. The 406Mhz SARSAT beacons are single use only one-way transmitters (they receive GPS, not 406Mhz-SARSAT, although they still work without a GPS signal). Anything that advertises using it to send SMS messages is junk for emergency use.
There's an older, lower-frequency SARSAT band somewhere in the 150mhz-ish range, but it gets so many false positives (like some ATM in Kansas) that it's basically retired. The 406Mhz protocol has a lot more checksums in it.
Edit: you want this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Cospas-Sarsat_...
Also, seeing on https://www.acrartex.com/products/resqlink-400 it says "Battery Replacement: After 5 years or after emergency use, whichever is first"
Speaking of packaging, the product you linked to is the buoyant version. Don't get that for hiking, it's significantly larger (physically) than the non-buoyant one. Confusingly, they are both called the "ResQLink 400".
I really don't understand what's behind those types of irrational fears. Some nights I can't even walk from the kitchen to the bathroom without turning the light on in the corridor. I know there's nothing behind the corner, just like I'm sure you knew there were no "terrible things in the night coming to get you", yet I must turn on the light
When I was a kid, I used to think that adults are not afraid of the dark because they are adults. I'm almost 30 now, and I often wonder if I never really became an adult that's never afraid of the dark.
I think there's some kind of psychological/physiological feedback loop that goes on in those moments at night where you feel compelled to run to the door or switch the lights on or whatever. Sometimes rationality just doesn't help.
I have a fear of the dark, for lack of a better term. I can put myself in the shoes of characters in horror movies and feel their fear. Meanwhile my girlfriend is incapable of it. Not because I somehow believe in things that go bump in the night (I don’t) and she doesn’t, but rather it’s some sort of mental quirk that she doesn’t experience.
I’ve embraced it, though. Whenever I’m doing something like solo camping or running through the woods at night, I like to enumerate terrifying scenarios and then when I get home, jot them into my notes app and sometimes stub them out into short stories that I submit to those scary story youtube channels or r/nosleep.
Anyways, I’ve thought a lot about why I would have this fear reflex while others don’t. Doesn’t seem to be much explanation. I’m in my thirties. Embrace the thrill.
When you're younger, you're trying to figure out who you are and a big part of it is seeking out new people to learn about the world and yourself. I think you also tend to need others to validate you more. I can definitely tell that when I was younger I would share more about my hobbies or interests with others in the hopes that they would like them too and want to share in them with me, with a little bit of wanting to be complimented on my uniqueness. Now that I'm older, I do that far less.
As a 24 y/o who struggled with forming meaningful friendships in my teen years, your comment as someone in their 40s was soothing.
I'd like to reach that stage of life where I internalize the fact that other's validation doesn't matter as much as I think it does.
I completely and wholly understand -- intellectually -- that other folks opinion and/or attention toward me shouldn't have an impact on my self-esteem and well-being (and just like many others, I've even read whole books on this very topic), but putting it into practice has been a struggle and I find it super hard to fight against the in-built and well-oiled 'validation seeking' neural circuitry up in my head.
In your 30s and 40s, you stop caring what other people think about you.
In your 50s and 60s, you realize that no one was really thinking about you after all.
I know that sounds like some sort of cringe hallmark card. I know I completely dismissed that sort of sentiment when I was younger, but as I've gotten older, I've found it rings more true.
As they get older, that drive diminishes, like all things related to gene spreading.
You saying this gives me some kind of weird feeling of knowing that it will probably get less in the future. I don't mind the feeling now and it keeps my on my feet and makes me do things, but I don't think I'd want to keep this feeling when I'm approaching the 40s.
I even believe that midlife crisis is a 2nd phase of the same issue. You run after the job market trusting the laws, seeking success.. and after 20 years of seeing what a mess it is you just can't avoid jolting back to your natural needs.
I talk to myself constantly, which always puts me to sleep, so in that case it's useful.
No more difficulty falling asleep. It has gotten me thru a very stressful time.
I have anxiety, somewhat, I need the right level of engagement but not too much interest then I can fall asleep. Rick & Morty, Brookly 99 do it for me - just enough to keep my mind from wandering, not enough to keep me awake.
At one point I tried to cease this behavior because I had a perception it was negative, but I actually found my ability to be prepared for real conversations declined as well, so I've re-engaged the behavior. Visualization and behavioral rehearsal is something I've had several instructors for various things (weightlifting, target shooting, etc) encourage and at least for me it has panned out.
The question should really be "does X behavior cause any problems in my life?" If it doesn't cause you problems then you're good, and if it does, then you should look to alleviate those problems (whether that's modifying the behavior or the situation). If playing out social situations does alleviate the anxiety and your only downside is sometimes the people in your house give you funny looks - well that's probably a worthwhile tradeoff. On the other hand, if the behavior is aggravating social anxiety, then it's worth talking to someone about.
Social anxiety falls under the generalized anxiety tree, and most people do feel some anxiety in social situations - but if it's disruptive to your life then it may be worth chatting with a therapist with. Most therapists are going to try and identify the specific causes and then give you tools to alleviate those feelings.
As for having imaginary conversations with real people I know that are neither repeats of past conversations nor rehearsals of future conversations, I think there may have been a slight decline but I didn’t do a ton of this prior.
TL;DR: I think mindfulness meditation helps with this.
"Although these might have seemed off the cuff and spontaneous, they were generally carefully rehearsed, words carefully selected for punning potential, stored in his prodigious memory and then released on their unsuspecting recipient at the right moment"
https://winstonchurchill.org/the-life-of-churchill/life/man-...
My mouth and hands will move in accordance with those imaginations.
This really sounds like you have a dissociative spectrum symptom. Up to 1 in 12 people are at the very least at the OSDD-1b spectrum, down to 1 in 100ish and > with DID, so it's super common.
Most people don't know they're systems, but usually it involves a lot of talking to one's self, having a lot of very distinct "modes", certain kinds of memory issues/weird amnesia/short term stuff, the ability/feeling like you could be really good friends with yourself (alternately, the ability to deeply hate yourself as well), and being able to go from having an amazing day to absolute raw terror, not even recognizing it because of emotional amnesia.
So yes, it is normal, and this sounds very system-ey. If you are a system, don't pass over this! Discovering your dissociative spectrum tendencies, if you have them, is very hard and requires a lot of effort, but it is a transition that is very significantly life-changing, in a very positive direction.
The most important thing is that if your identity is fragmented, most people only focus on meeting the needs/listening to the people near the front of the brain/consciousness, so the younger alters/personality states/people/etc. get ignored and there's always anxiety and never-ending loops of feeling a desperate need for something but not getting it (because communication between people in the brain -- and yes, they are individual people! you can share multiple people in a brain, it's just like your body is more of a mech than anything else -- is usually completely cut off with DID and vastly inhibited with dissociative spectrum disorders, but the emotions eventually build up under pressure and finally leak out there.)
In any case, for the first month or so before I started my job, I was totally alone in my apartment and didn't have any conversations in my native language (English) the whole time. I began to have imaginary conversations with loved ones, both in dreams and in waking life, very much like the kind you describe.
I am one who has always been introverted and ok being alone, but this was an extremely disorienting experience. I coped by keeping a journal. The upside was that I eventually developed an ability to not feel lonely even while alone for long periods.
- replaying some sort of argument/confrontation or other high-stakes conversation from earlier in the day (simulating ways the conversation could have gone better--the best zingers are the ones you come up with in bed at night).
- preparing for an important presentation or meeting the next day (informal rehearsal).
- out hiking alone (especially longer solo backpacking trips). Without fresh content bombarding my brain, I tend to dwell on the same ideas/conversations.
- reading a particularly engrossing book, and get into a character from their point of view.
- studying something new, then I imagine myself tutoring someone else on the subject (my go-to learning technique).
Now if you find yourself having conversations that you were convinced are real at the time, but it later dawns on you that it never actually happened, then that might be something to talk (for real) to someone about.
It is fine and good if you are doing it with purpose (e.g. tutoring someone else in your mind to understand something better, or trying to work out some problem that has a solution), but bad if you are trying to solve something unsolvable, dwelling on the past or worrying about the future, or just wasting your own CPU cycles.
This is something you can practice as part of mindfulness practice - getting spontaneous awareness that you are engaging in an unproductive internal dialogue and letting it go. Not fight it or stop it, but just let the thoughts come and go without engaging with them.
The introductory course on the Headspace app I also found good but I think it is better to not stay on it beyond that.
If your thoughts keep you awake sometimes I think you would definitely benefit greatly from this.
But I disagree slightly on #3. My frame of reference is thru-hiking and/or intense solo missions where I'm alone in the backcountry hiking for 10-14 hours a day for days on end. In that setting, I find it impossible to stay mindful continuously. Also, without news/email/social media/etc. as input, I just find that my mind gravitates towards internal dialogues about the same big picture life issues. In that state, I'm actually listening to my body and mind more, not less. Personally, it can be frustrating to worry about whether I'm "in the moment" enough (the quintessential frustration with mindfulness, I know).
That said, I do try to mix it up between fully immersing myself in the wonderment of the wilderness, letting my mind chew on ideas, listening to podcasts/music, and sometimes attempting actual meditation sessions.
One definitely should not be frustrated or worrying about being in the moment! I agree that it is all normal in the sense that one shouldn't be worrying about any of these habits. It's just that for me it was a revelation when after many many years I realized that I do not have to have/follow internal dialogues and that they may actually causing me tension and anxiety.
I’ve been doing that for years and eventually the conversation with someone else vanished and it became simply my own inner monologue.
My gut points to the limbic-cortex feedback loop. Emotional vibe in the limbic system retrieves motor agency to recite a fact and relay it.
Our society pushes constant contact. Our cortex responds in that habit.
Over time the dialog with a friend seemed superfluous. As if my cortex finally learned to ignore that as part of fact retrieval.
Just a weird vibe from a one time shroom head. YMMV
Now it all may be odd sounding thing but it seems okay for me as I do not look to confirm to any group nor looking for anyone to confirm to my ideas.
To change focus you must have a goto list of things that have a track record of leading your mind to some place healty and good.
The researchers suggest that lonely people's thoughts are directed inwards due to a lack of social experiences, and this is what alters the brain. But I wonder how many people just have brains like this, and feel lonely as a consequence?
There might be a few cases where loneliness is "caused" by a problem in the brain, but I would wager the vast majority of cases are caused by what I described above - lack of regular meaningful interaction with a partner over an extended period.
When I'm single and without many friends around, I rather just slide past life. I don't latch onto interesting stuff as much. I have my thought processes and goals and since nobody asks how my day was, there's no point in remembering minor inconsequential stuff. But as you don't need to remember them, you don't even notice them. Like even a mundane task of taking a package to the post will be more of an emotional adventurous roller coaster when I have people in my life and rather a goal-directed straightforward thing when not.
In other words, assuming that holds, there can’t be “I” if there’s no one else.
With that theory in mind, when I experience this “sliding past life” (quite an apt analogy), I actually see it as evidence of myself in some ways becoming less conscious, or at least less self-aware.
It’d seem that some don’t experience such a contrast between being social and being alone; I suspect it could be because these maps their minds build have more “inertia” and are used in absence of the “territory” for longer. In a way that must be a nice feature, though on the other hand this might imply that such models aren’t as tightly coupled to reality.
Just seeing some preliminary findings about this makes me feel so much more valid in what I’ve been going through.
At the risk of being crude, Fuck loneliness
I'm curious about how a sizeable fraction of the population "lacking inner thought" https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pristine-inner-exper... throws off that figure.
It raises a disturbing question: what feelings can/cannot be had if you not the conscientiousness to experience it?
I recognize the wrong person can derail my entire life.
Took alot of pain to get to this point. It's better to few friends than those who will bring harm
I'd tell my sister to avoid any guy going though an eviction or without stable housing, likewise I don't get involved with anyone who isn't in a good situation.
And wada ya know, I'm a senior level engineer now, have had a few great relationships, and I'm in such a great place. But I also understand how fragile it all is. And with that exclusion is necessary.
It's basically creating an imaginary friend, except "different" somehow?
Tried to find a decent representative article or video, but didn't really feel comfortable linking to any of them.
The biggest impression I got from looking into the concept was that these people were profoundly lonely.
I thought the husband had an entirely valid request of "Your tulpa can't be in a sexual relationship with someone else"
Obviously I don't know anything about the situation beyond what is in the podcast, but up until that point it seemed like a "my husband won't accept my quirks" type of thing.
After they read his excerpt, I was much more inclined to think she was really the one at fault for their relationship falling apart.
All I can say is I'm glad I'm not having to deal with that situation.
Also interesting to note that the lead photo for loneliness in this article makes it seem all sexy and desirable.
Could it be that you personally find the model sexy and desirable?
There is nothing inherently attractive about a person sitting alone in an uncomfortable chair next to an empty couch. The model even has a closed posture and is slouching, which are a nonverbal messages that indicates anxiety. Their half dressed state also indicates a depressed state.
Not that I have a chance with any!
1) Start lifting weights. Helps boost your confidence and your T levels, making you more attractive.
2) If you do not yet practice the rudiments of grooming, do so. Shower every day, shave, comb your hair. Make sure your clothes are clean and you don't smell.
3) The key to engaging with women is: when you encounter a new one, always be kind to her and treat her with the basic amount of courtesy and respect due another human being but no more. Avoid fawning over her, no matter how cute or hot you find her. Keep it in the back of your brain that she's just a woman, just a human, and may be as messed up as you are if not more so. Hold the door open for her, help her load her groceries, or whatever -- then disengage. If you get a smile or thank you, savor it. A smile or thank you from a pretty girl is a tiny gift, and we accept gifts graciously and appreciatively without hoping for more.
It's kind of this weird tension. You can't give off "looking for a date" vibes. If a girl is to any extent cute she will know it, and she will be able to use that to control the interaction if you seem too desperate. The vibe to cultivate is basically pleasant, but somewhat aloof. Make her feel like she has to work to prove herself to you. If she's at all interested, she will put in the work. You've gotta do this with multiple women, keeping them in your friend circle while not giving off thar you want to get closer -- that is not until they signal they want the same (and they will in unambiguous terms!). And it may take years to get there. Anyone who tells you finding a good partner is quick or easy is selling something.
"When you encounter a stranger, be pleasant but aloof. Disengage."
To
"Keep women in your friends circle"
Without mentioning how to get from A to B. I mean, how to actually befriending them in the first place, which is probably one of the biggest hurdles and stumbling blocks for most people here who have the same problem.
I.e. Women who are single, available and are my friends are represented by the empty set.
Asking your non-single friends to introduce you to single friends doesn't accomplish anything, since they might talk about doing that, but it'll never happen (I've seen it multiple times)
That was the case even when I was going out regularly, before the pandemic... Since unfortunately most of my social interactions are in groups heavily biased towards male representation.
The only way around that, as I recognize... Is to get different hobbies. But it's not that simple to get yourself to start liking a new thing (and spend multiple hours every week on that!) If you have
1 - A job draining most of your energy
2 - already happily spending time on hobbies that you enjoy.
"Thankfully" the pandemic solved the gender bias problem regarding the friends that I regularly meet... Since now all in-person friend interaction over several months can be counted on your fingers
(Btw, now I'm in a LDR... Which is definitely not ideal, but at least helps a lot with loneliness)
They are wearing a fashionable shirt that is off a shoulder and is longer than her pants. Her pants _are_ visible, so she is not half-dressed, she is just wearing pants that are much more useful for fashion than relaxing, which makes me think she has social activities planned. We also get a fairly large portion of the room in the shot, and it looks expensive and well-cleaned.
Again, I didn't notice this at all, but I do not think the poster is projecting at all, just reading into different cues.
Here are some shots of the same composition with another model https://unsplash.com/photos/PqIvg8mw-4U https://unsplash.com/photos/DJGg9tYrDLo.
Here is another angle of that other model https://www.facebook.com/Anthony.fotography/photos/418260795... where you can see she is staring at the wall with no smile on her face.
To me, those are women in "pyjamas" lounging in an empty apartment, lost in deep thoughts. The composition of the photo is cold, with hues of blue and the model is centered in the frame. They appear homesick or nostalgic. I doubt that the artist aimed to show comfort and happiness.
The only time I would wear such clothings (big warm socks, a pair of boyshorts and a long shirt) is when I am not expecting any company and when I'm not expecting to go outside. Going outside would require changing socks, putting pants on and wearing a shirt that is not transparent.
I agree that they are glamorous, but aren't big empty apartments the loneliest?
-----
- Lonely people's brains are different due to excess of imaginary social contact
- Older patients 23% more likely to die if surgery occurs on surgeon's birthday
- Study on IQs of video gamers finds women outscore men, Android outscores iOS
- IQ and EQ: study finds gifted people also have higher emotional intelligence
- [flagged] Study links mindfulness and meditation to narcissism and “spiritual superiority”
- Less alcohol consumption is the main reason why young people are having less sex
- Study: Users initiate 89% of smartphone interactions, only 11% via notifications
- Biden's Secretary of State nominee is a part-time rock star with a Spotify page
- What Delaware license plates tell us about social status signalling
-----
This very marginal social science at best.
I call this "pre-stressing". Similar to how concerete is pre-stressed. "It is substantially prestressed during production, in a manner that strengthens it against tensile forces which will exist when in service.". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prestressed_concrete.
Now I am wondering if my "aphantasia" also explains why I rarely feel lonely.
Could it be that people who are able to see and hear their friends in their mind are more likely to miss them?
I would be curious to know if "lone wolves" exhibit the same brain features as those who feel alone (which would suggest that they are actually lying to themselves?) or if they exhibit different features, or if they are the same as people who can feel lonely but don't because they are "socially satisfied".
I can "day-think" aka get lost in logical thoughts. I don't have the inner voice either, so it's less like reading a text and somewhat more like reading code. No narration, just a stream of... invisible "variables". It's hard to explain without having experienced what other people see or hear, I have no point of reference.
I also have the bad habit of forgetting people. "Out of sight, out of mind", except I do have object persistence. I imagine it is easier to randomly think about someone when you can hear or see them at will.
Same for authors who write lengthy descriptions of environments and characters in books. I just figured that some people enjoyed to keeping notes of the descriptions -- architects maybe. I always skipped them.
On the opposite of that, VR is really amazing. Being able to keep my VR headset just above my eyes and look into an imaginary world at the same time as the real one? Simply mind blowing. I guess that's how people feel when they picture things.
You could try looking through an unplugged VR headset. You would see how I feel without any images!
Would you estimate that you have less periods of feeling cringe, for you cannot re-play an embarassing conversation in your mind?
Now the spicy, Ethical question. Would you estimate that you have less periods of feeling remorse for your actions?
I think so. I barely remember anything from my childhood. I experience nostalgia but probably less of it. For example, smelling garlic bread will make me think of my childhood home that was next to an italian restaurant. I can also perfectly remember the layout of the building. I remember the fear I had one day as there was no electricity and I had to climb 4 flights of stairs in pitch black. But I can't see any of it. I can't see what my grandmother used to look like. In a strange happenstance, I remember she looked a bit like the queen does on the $20 paper bills so I often get nostalgia by handling money. She did not look identical, but had enough "variables" that were identical for my mind to "confuse" or "link" the two, in a way. I know that when I was a child, I would confuse my parents or teachers with characters seen on TV.
> Would you estimate that you have less periods of feeling cringe, for you cannot re-play an embarrassing conversation in your mind?
Actually, I can remember conversations. I simply cannot hear them or see them. I still have the text transcript of it silently playback into my memory, bringing back conversations in my short term memory and allowing me to relive them. It's more like instinctively knowing, the same way you know 4+4=8 without imagining two bundles of four sticks. The only sound I can produce in my head is my own voice, so sometimes I will "talk" with someone else anyway. It is identical to how it would look to see me read outloud the dialogues for two characters. I have been told that people can even hear musical instrument... all I can do it focus hard and reproduce the noise of the instrument with my voice. So it just sound like acapella done by someone with no music talent.
To answer your question, I rarely have issues falling asleep. I do have memories of times where I was a teen and would struggle to fall asleep because I would think back on what happened at school. But it was a rare occurrence.
> Now the spicy, Ethical question. Would you estimate that you have less periods of feeling remorse for your actions?
Yes. I feel as if it has taken me more time than others to reach certain developmental milestones. Now that I am an adult, I have those remorse. I can think about how doing X would trigger Y and make someone feel like Z. It's like a huge mindmap. But before being able to juggle so many concepts, events and variables? I wondered for a long time if I might be a sociopath. Turns out I simply needed to learn all of those concepts from a different perspective. Like a left handed person trying to learn to write by attempting to mimic a right handed person.
I've been working remotely since March and not seen anybody socially since December last year, and frankly it's been great. In a normal year I only meet up with my friends once or twice anyway.
[1] (I saw my friends a grand total of 4 times in 2020, pandemic has been awful for my mental health lmfao)
She also loved keeping things in order. She didn't like it when the other cats and dogs would sometimes be chaotic. And she had some sort of code involving behavior: she was never selfish. If another cat or dog was already on her favorite pillow or eating her favorite snack, she'd let them have it. But if someone tried to cheat her or blatantly take something of hers, she'd react with growls and barks. She was clearly lawful good.
So we made up a long backstory. She was once a cop. Spent a lot of years street patrolling and getting to know everyone in her neighborhood. She was well liked, even by the street criminals. She was always fair to everyone she met. Even those who would not return fairness to her.
This all paid off. She eventually made detective. She was good investigating things. But something happened. She was backstabbed by corrupt people on the force. Got too close to breaking a case that would have taken down not only a major cartel, but also the cops who sold out. She was murdered.
Then reincarnated as a Newfoundland. She can't remember her past life clearly. But the desire to sniff everything out, and the desire to take care of everyone while keeping them in line, somehow persisted. She's driven to do something she doesn't completely understand, but she did it the best she could.
Her companion in life was an aussie who had a much simpler back story. She fit the manic pixie girl stereotype. Just pure chaos, pranks, and she liked stealing from and manipulating the poor newfie. They were a very odd couple: the by-the-rules ex-cop and the sarcastic girl who liked silly & mean jokes in equal proportion. But out on the trail, the aussie would put her silliness aside, and would work diligently with the newfie to solve whatever mystery they found. The typical odd couple of a modern police procedural.
I've now written multiple paragraphs about my dogs' stories. I guess that's my own way of reacting to the sheer loneliness of this year.
This feels like a faulty approach. There is a world of difference between being alone and feeling alone. You can feel alone without being alone, for example. I am wrapping up my fifth military deployment and as such have spent a considerable amount of time actually alone compared to other adults. From numerous points of observation some adults are more capable of performing, and even possibly appreciating, time apart from other adults more than others. Some people simply cannot handle it and literally go crazy.
If the study does not account for such a foundational distinction I can’t, in good faith, consider the results valid. This distinction is hard to appreciate until you have been alone for an extended period and observed differences of performance relative to other people.
- A lack of emotional response is just as subjective as a presence of emotional response.
- Those of us (including me) who lack common emotional responses are more likely to miss normal social cues, and thereby less likely to have objective interpretations of social scenarios.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20039-w
Also note loneliness is defined here as "perceived social isolation".
To me, loneliness exists when there's a Δ between one's need for social interaction and the actual social interaction one gets. To close the gap, one can adjust either parameter or both: either lower one's expectations, or increase actual interaction, or both.
The socially well-adjusted introvert generally comes out ahead in most situations due to the ability to regulate both parameters.
This sounds like a line Igor or Morgana would say in Persona 5.
—Nikola Tesla
Be alone for enough time and you'll be just as insane as poor Tesla. He didn't exactly live a good life.
What would be fascinating to me is an exploration of causality.
Can feelings of loneliness be increased by an upregulation (dTCS) of Default Mode Network activity? Can they be reduced by a downregulation? Can either of those be performed without substantially changing the subjects conscious qualia or internal states?
This will be really interesting to watch in a few years.
As I grew older, I had many poor social experiences. I felt that the social sphere was dominated by callous, insensitive jerks who talked louder, or whoever had the wittier comeback when being egged on, and I was hurt many times, and I most likely hurt others as well! I started to resent interactions with most people, thinking that most people aren't well intentioned or are unaware. I didn't want to have small talk or banter, because I was interested in random trivia and deep emotional experiences, which don't have a place in many social situations or seem to interest much people. Obviously I have also found quite a few people who were graceful in this regard, such as the few close friends I still have.
and
> “In the absence of desired social experiences,” the authors write, “lonely individuals may be biased towards internally directed cognitions,” as if “to fill the social void.”
I would say they have this exactly backwards. The act of conjuring up these desired scenarios while not being in such a situation 'creates' the feeling of loneliness. So the sequence as I see it is: person likes company, person has free time to ponder and imagines social situations, then feels lonely. I also recall interactions and play out future possible situations or memories. I don't however long for them, rather it's usually more analytical as what should I do if that should come to pass or what could I have done differently/better. It's not that I want to be in those situations. I do miss diversity of activity alone or socially.
As I understand it, loneliness is a psychological state that results when a person feels deprived of meaningful contact with other humans. Very few people can maintain their sanity and well-being completely cut off from their fellow humans (the proverbial hermit living contently in the wilderness with only himself for company is a rare phenomenon) but how much and what type of social contact an individual needs to maintain their equilibrium varies wildly.
So, it is impossible to determine how lonely a given person is only by looking how much time they spend alone or how anxious they are in social situations.
Reminds me a lot of bush-fever, where you've been living out in the woods for so long you start to get a bit nutty. Highly recommended life experience btw.
And I don't even think of it as a negative. More just a part of how I came to be who I am. I am fortunate to have several good close friends, many more warm acquaintances across the continent, and a good number of family members that I genuinely like. I just defaulted to being alone and I didn't learn how to interact with my peers in a social context until later than most.
I thought people just don't like me, but apparently some do, except everything ends up in nothing, and I don't know why.
However, I sometimes find myself getting wrapped up in hypothetical, imaginary social situations (especially when lying awake in bed) - usually reacting angrily.
Not sure what that's about.
At least in my experience, those "internally directed cognitions" create a level of detail in expressed ideas which attract others to converse more with me.
Did I just figure out that I'm the Kwisatz Haderach, or don't most people do this?