Define "hurt".
I'd rather make a decision to pay $5/month for a service than to be the product and get spied on
Define "hurt".
I'd rather make a decision to pay $5/month for a service than to be the product and get spied on
That might be legal for the moment but it is in no way moral.
How, exactly? It's entirely opaque to the user.
At a minimum, you should offer a free, ad-supported version alongside a paid, ad-free (and tracking free) experience.
Democracies are bought on advertising.
Hiding the price of the user's attention is not a positive side effect to the user. Hiding who buys the user's attention is not a positive side effect to the user. Hiding how many other people's attentions are also being sold is not a positive side effect to the user. All of these are detriments to the user.
This cannot be an afterthought—it must be the central question all advertising skeptics must start with.