Anti-Pasta: When Italian Futurists Tried to Ban Pasta in Italy
mentalfloss.com
mentalfloss.com
Pasta gets a bad rap unfairly, I think. A few years ago over the course of ~18 months, I lost 100 lbs. I ate pasta almost every day when I did this.
One problem, particularly in the US, is that portion sizes are so large. This affects much more than just pasta. But in the American mind, a serving of pasta is often easily 3x what it should be. A small plate of pasta, maybe pancetta, some cheese and an egg? Filling, but also can be light.
The serving seems gigantic though.
Portions with 125g of uncooked pasta feel fine to me. That‘s 450 calories. Plus sauce (200 on the low end, 350 calories on the high end, depending on what exactly you want to eat – 200 calories would be something like a 400g can of tomatoes, garlic, onions, some olive oil) and cheese (100 calories for 25g Parmesan) you end up with a meal that‘s between 750 and 900 calories.
That between a normal and large-ish meal, though in both cases not exactly huge. Definitely something you could conceivably eat every day without much trouble, though I do agree that something with less carbs would probably be a bit more filling.
125g uncooked dried pasta should be about 280g cooked pasta.
Don’t get me wrong, I can eat 180g of uncooked pasta no problem. But that tends to go right up to the line of feeling very full.
My sauces are generally quite light. I'm vegetarian, so they never involve calorie-dense ingredients such as guanciale or pancetta. (I know, I know, what am I missing and so on... :D)
For me pasta means less ingredients as possible, at the highest possible quality.
Examples: Fresh Tomato-Basil Spaghetti. I use only spaghetti from selected Italian brands such as De Cecco - low end but extremely good in my opinion - Rummo or Gentile, organic Tomatoes from a fresh food store, my own home-grown basil, extra virgin olive oil from Calabria, chili also from Calabria, extra-fine tomato extract from Mutti.
Fettucelle burro e limone: Fettuccelle DeCecco, Irish butter, Bio shallots, Phu Quoc black pepper, organic Lemons (from Sorrento when in Italy, just bio when here in Germany) for the juice and the zest.
Fusilli or Rigatoni alla Norma. Organic tomato sauce from Mutti with pieces of tomatoes, organic aubergines from Italy, same olive oil from Calabria, same chili from calabria, my own basil...
And so on: Aglio e Olio e Peperoncino, Arrabbiata, Puttanesca, Pasta all'aglione, ecc.. The sauce is never heavy, and the pasta itself can shine. As you can see I also never cook pasta as an afterthought. This way, you can definitely control how much you eat.
Habits subjected to radically change when I visit mamma e babbo back in Italy.
Don’t get me wrong, 180g is no problem for me, I can even over-indulge and go for more, but that insures feeling disgusting afterwards (in that sense 180g seems like a pretty good delineator between large but possible and too much).
Currently I’m losing weight (very necessary) so I’m hyper-aware of portion size and while the first couple of weeks 125g portions felt unimaginably small I think I got used to them and they don’t leave me back empty anymore. But, yeah, not as filling as something with much more vegetables and, say, tofu and some rice.
I agree that pasta shapes are required for certain dishes.
We aren't exactly skinny, either, despite being pretty active (an average of 70 miles of cycling a week).
The difference is probably made up with vegetables, fruit etc.
Basically, a box fed about 5 people.
125g would be roughly .3 liters or 1.25 cups of a pasta like spaghetti (i.e. one that isn't hollow so it fills up most of the available space)
25g of cheese would be just enough to melt and form a thin layer over the top of the pasta
I think that I would want some meatballs or cubed chicken (or a vegetarian equivalent) to feel satisfied. However, I also probably wouldn't add the cheese so maybe it equals out somewhat.
Full disclosure: we're also all very sedentary
I'm nearly forty, and 1,74m and weigh between 76 and 78 kg (depending on the time of the year). I'm a software developer and only do loaded carries three times a week.
My wife always asks where all the calories go ;-).
I eat 80gr of pasta, a bit more at the restaurant (they make larger portions), I hate big bowls of pasta and have it no more than 2/3 times a week, usually less.
Pasta is a kind of food you have to eat and then wait that gastric acids kick in to take the hunger away
If you're trying to eat pasta until it makes you feel full, you're having too much of it.
Pasta releases water over time and too much of it will also make you very sleepy, especially after lunch.
That's why there is a tradition in Italy of not working too much after lunch and shops used to reopen in the afternoon at 16. People had too much pasta (they had not much more to eat, until they had it)
But if you eat it once a week I guess it's ok, my grandma used to eat pasta with bread everyday and she lived 96 years...
I did a lot of sport in the past, it doesn't really keep your weight down, to lose weight doing sport, while also eating a lot without limits, you should do it 12 hours a day.
I was luck enough to be born genetically skinny, but now that we are older many of my friends are fighting against weight daily, despite being professional players on a strict diet until their 30s.
This is true for every food in the US.. (I'm an overweight French guy who eat too much but in the US even the "small" portions were far too much for me)
https://mk0dietvsdiseascuno2.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/upload...
Carbs are energy. You just have to be sure to only eat what you need and actually use the energy. Otherwise the body starts storing it as fat. And like you said small portions of fatty things like cheese and eggs are perfectly fine as long as you burn what you eat.
Even something like Bloomberg's ban on large sodas is probably heavy handed. Sugar is not always a poison. It can be a valuable fuel, even at large quantities (and large sizes can also add a lot of convenience to some people's lives).
It's sugar, it provides energy. Some people like the taste and the bubbly sensation of soda.
Here is Zdeno Chara, one of the best defencemen in recent hockey history drinking one during a very important game:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVA7lgJRHQQ
Just because someone who is burning 2,000 calories is drinking a small bottle doesn't mean it is appropriate to drink 2L everyday. Everything in moderation.
Portion size was the key for me. I stopped feeling heavy and lethargic after pasta meals once I started weighting my pasta before eating. This made a world of difference on my state after eating and, by contrast, helped me realise how heavy I usually felt after eating (80g of uncooked pasta seem to be a good balance for me).
When I cooked professionally in Rome, we weighed out 50g for Italians and 100g for Americans in terms of planning large buffet/group lunches (combined with options for soup and 6-7 different salad or veggie dishes).
I've found that 75g hits the spot for me.
In France, cuisine critics Gault et Millau attacked the fat, slow cooked, sauce heavy French cuisine for the same reason, opening the way for the new French cuisine "chefs". Pleasures of the senses over satiety.
Earlier, Etienne Auguste Parmentier used elaborate tactics to have the potato accepted by the population, from fake guards around the fields and pamphlets against the various roots people used to eat when low on wheat.
During the French Revolution, cuisine was also purged from its aristocratic attributes, prohibiting the unnecessary complexities. Maybe inspired by the Protestant reform culinary ethos where food should be fresh, humble and roborative.
Nice stories.
Is there any actual proof of this? The same story has been told about Frederick the Great, and I always assumed it was an urban legend.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8968-everything-you-see-i-o...
https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard...
But the findings haven’t disappeared — the authors have replaced the paper with a new version, which softens its earlier claims.
https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/13/does-the-mediterranea...
Now consider that since probably the early 19th century this has always been happening.
Finally, consider that it's happening 'right now' - so which of the 'futurists' today are out to lunch, quite obviously so, we're just to 'caught up' to see it that way?
Not sure why so many other ingredients are added here. The pasta with only semolina and water tastes much better.
Also make sure to cook it al dente, not al mush: https://www.simongriffee.com/pastaclock/
I understand it's de rigour to eat "pure" foods, but it's actually led to reduced intake of important nutrients in the wider population. For example, until very recently iodine wasn't included in prenatal vitamins because for much of the past century most people used fortified salt. But with the increased use of kosher salt in home kitchens, medical advice not to add too much salt when cooking, and the fact that prepackaged foods don't contain iodized salt, iodine intake began to drop in the United States and UK.
I noticed that after eating pasta, my blood sugar stayed elevated for 4-5 hours. It looks like calling pasta and bread "slow carbs" is appropriate.
One of my conclusions from the experiment is that I will probably never buy wheat again (but I'll eat it if I get it served).
But how long your blood sugar stayed high after eating "fast carbs"?
I never tried only carbs/fruits in a meal. I always add fat and some protein. I should try it for my next experiment.
The glucose response also appears to be affected by physical activity before or after a meal. You can "walk-off" a heavy meal.
During the experiment I made a homemade pizza with about 300 g of flour. After eating it I experienced brain-fog and I was not able to focus on reading a book that evening.
Ate mostly plain sweet potatoes for a month. Mental clarity sky rocketed.
Most foods make me mentally sluggish for hours. Strict keto leaves me physically weak though
Fruits like banana, apples and clementine appears to be fine.
The highest glucose I measured was after a parsimon.
I tested potatoes as a part of a meal, and it gave a small and short elevation.
I tried rice twice and it gave a high but short elevation.
Sequencing also appears to be important. Start the meal with fat and protein and finish with carbs. The French desert is a good idea. Bread as an appetiser at restaurants is a bad idea.
"Fast" -- candy, soda, etc. Hits in 20 mins and is gone in 2.5 hrs.
"Normal" -- pasta, a sandwich, rice, etc. Hits in 30-45 mins and is gone in 4/5 hrs
"Slow" -- high fat foods, peanut butter, meats, etc. hits in ~2h and is gone in 7-9
Made a little chart (†). The area under those curves is the same for the same g of carbohydrate but the shape is different.
The thing is, pasta is heavy. Compared to most meals it's dense and almost pure carbohydrate. So if you have even a little bit of insulin resistance you will definitely feel it.
Then there's alcohol, that lives in the complete opposite corner: a shot of vodka hits in the "fast" category but then actually lowers the BG later on.
all very (subjectively) true. As a pasta fanatic I try to eat Kamut pasta as often as possible as it leaves much less of a lethargic and carby aftermath.
"Pasta is a cruel and brutalizing food that makes you lazy and sentimental."
Punk is strong anti-fascist.
Of course it's easy in retrospect to note that (Italian) fascists and Futurist groups did cross paths during their ascent, but that does not mean that Futurism was fascist in its philosophy.
The Futurist manifesto has “gems” such as: “We want to glorify war - the only cure for the world - militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of the anarchists, the beautiful ideas which kill, and contempt for woman.”
Source: TFA
OI certainly had a strong association with hard right politics - but that was a bit later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTj1TtXHKG0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiSkiUw7dA&list=OLAK5uy_lx_...
(side note: I lament being born too late to ever experience real subculture...)
I have to admit, I was also expecting an article from 1930 being used to hn.
Though still an interesting article or at least i'd never heard about any of this before anyway.
I had a coworker say that since rice absorbs water, it can also do this during digestion.
I noticed a similar effect when I was drinking too much. I would only be hungover after having rice.
And to clarify a point, it was fried rice that cooled, meaning it wasn't watery.
However: "Although popular legend claims Marco Polo introduced pasta to Italy following his exploration of the Far East in the late 13th century, pasta can be traced back as far as the 4th century B.C., where an Etruscan tomb showed a group of natives making what appears to be pasta." (wikipedia)
Personally I've never referred to Spaghetti as noodles, and noodles to me means long thin things you put in stir-fry/ramen. Plus, there's many other shapes of pasta other than "noodle" shaped.
Rice noodles aren't pasta.
Pasta refers to the substance the food is made from, not its form.
This might be time-appropriate for 1930, but leaving that drivel uncommented perpetuates the oppression and violence immanent in it.
/S
"E la pastasciutta è antivirile perchè lo stomaco appesantito ed ingombro non è mai favorevole all’entusiasmo fisico per la donna e alla possibilità di possederla dirittamente."
So it's indeed saying "possessing her", though a more idiomatic translation would probably be to say "taking her", since "possess" is rarely used as a term for sex at least in modern English.
You're suggesting there exists someone who might read this interesting morsel of history and walk away, convinced by the excerpts, with anti-pasta views accompanied by a superstition that has them avoiding Italian cuisine on their first date unless warned otherwise.
Seems quite far-fetched. Though who are we to stop such a gentleman from sparing a woman some indigestion after reading a 1930s dating tip?
We then had obvious paradoxes where in neighbours like France and Italy were the complete opposite reality. France with high fat had very low coronary heart disease and Italy which was low fat had high coronary heart disease.
There was no paradox, the science was fraudulent. Over the last several decades they have debunked and disproven this several times.
The fix for bad science is better science. this is over. We know all the health risks are from carbohydrates. This has been a fact for decades. Yet we sit here and grocery stores are 90% carbs. If we eliminate carbs from society, the food industry collapses >90%. Millions upon millions of jobs are headed to unemployment. worse yet, the majority of these people have no other skills.
We as a society basically cannot afford to stop eating carbs. Nobody will be cutting carbs out of their diet.
Citations please.
1969: Dietary sugar and coronary heart disease J Yudkin
1973: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/26/5/524/4816...
1977: "Diet-Heart: End of an Era" Mann George V
2002: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.0000019552.77...
2009: Sugar: The Bitter Truth, Robert Lustig (MD, PhD)
There's significant studies done in the last 10 years. We know for a fact that carbs/sugar are the problem. Virtually all diabetes associations now push low carb diets.
I suspect these citations will mean nothing, I'm down around -10 for this post. Like I said, going to be huge amounts of resistance to this one.