Hacker News Reader

> even with a powerful telescope stars don't fill up your entire field of view.

Suppose the experiment is repeated on a black pixel from the Deep Field image, and another swell of stars are observed, hinting at a kind of fractal distribution.

Were the universe eternal and static, why could this pattern not repeat indefinitely in infinite time, space and matter? The paradox seems to assume a kind of infinite level of sensitivity of the observer.

View on HN

No, the paradox as described in the Wikipedia article doesn't assume the infinite level of sensitivity.

The figure explains it visually - the further away you go from the observer, the more stars you capture in your camera's field of view and the apparent brightness stays the same. The 1/r^2 term for light intensity is cancelled by the r^2 for the number of stars.

It's interesting think what an experimental result you describe would imply. It either contradicts the nature of light or that we're in the center of a cloud of stars where the density of stars falls with distance from us.

Thanks for spelling it out. Makes more sense now.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com