Hacker News Reader

Comment by bawolff | Hacker News Reader

New Function() is just another name for eval(). It has nothing specificly to do with css.

Quick correction: it is not the same as eval. It does not have access to the current scope. It is technically a fair bit safer when trying to run code from a string.

It may have access to the window object, however, so if something important is there, if can probably mess with that.

Its pretty hard to imagine a situation where full access to the global scope (including DOM) is fine as long as the attacker doesn't have access to the current function's scope. Performance difference, sure, but safety difference is pretty far fetched.

Okay but what is the purpose of this code? why would you eval() CSS?

The purpose of the code is to steal credit cards.

> why would you eval() CSS?

It’s really as simple as “because you can”. This is just an obfuscation technique.

From my understanding, the code that the devs wrote is not to steal credit cards but to create some UI, however they do it in such a way that JS hidden in CSS that would normally won't run. gets run and which results in credit cards being stolen.

You can see the code in the tweet linked earlier. The hackers injected a small JS snippet on the page that fetches the value of —script from the CSS and evals it.b

Why would they fetch --script from CSS instead of getting the information from the DOM and sending it to their serves straight away if the can already put a JS on the page that gets executed?

This is an obfuscation technique, it’s not supposed to make sense.

Oh O.K, so it's not a CSS hack. I thought it's something smarter like exploiting a JS pattern to trick it to run JS from CSS.

So, the hackers need to have access both to CSS and HTML to put the malicious JS that looks innocent in the HTML and load the malicious JS from the CSS.

Now it makes sense, thanks.

Which honestly seems like a pretty bad obfuscation technique. Loading a string from a css file and then executing as js is suspicious af. There is literally no reason to ever do that normally.

Of course, detecting this in general is not easy to do.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com