Show HN: Fast, free online meetings - use code "hackernews" to play
meetingburner.com
meetingburner.com
The signup process is miserable. There's no reason to have it broken into so many steps. And damnit, after that many steps, why do I have to confirm my account via email and click a "Oh, gee, thanks. Now continue to your real account." No confirmation at all. Take me straight to my account.
Do you really need my phone number for registration ? Not a real question. Answer: NO.
Password length restriction ? Seriously ? My password isn't even that secure and I had to trim it for your guys' site. That's absurd and there's no valid excuse, no matter how plausible.
Six steps to schedule a meeting ? Not to mention the processes of each individual step -- the time selector is severely irritating; why do I have to make three conscious decisions per hour I want to select ? (First, what I click. Second, the hour. [and there's a moment of wait, is this AM/PM where maybe I cancel the click, change the AM/PM, then back] And finally, choosing AM/PM if I haven't already done so.) Just make it one nice big long list. Maybe if you want, select the hour and minutes separately.
Basically what I feel is that the UI is trying to present ALL of the features you provide without a clear understanding of how they're broken down. In your video, you present the tremendously arrogant tone of "everything else sucks, and damnit, we kick their ass" -- which is awesome!- but then I get into the product and it feels boring, bloated. Feels like a some old strung-out dude wearing ripped skinnies and a deep v-neck.
Ok, actually, it's nothing like that. That was a lie -- just that last part I mean. Skinnies rock. You should all wear skinnies.
I'll keep an eye on the product because I'm interested. Just try to embrace consistently the attitude you put forward in the video. Make sure the product truly fits that because then you've got something pretty cool. :)
Thanks, but no thanks.
"You automatically grant the Site and its affiliates, contractors, and partners, a world-wide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable license to use, modify, publicly display, reproduce and distribute the content in order for the Site to provide You the Service. If you object to any content on the Site, Your sole remedy is to cease using the Site."
Appreciate the note - this is the feedback we want to iron out for beta :)
We'll have a paid version for people that need bigger meeting rooms, corporate features etc.
But we'd like every HN user in the world to be on a free version of MB when they're meeting with their distributed teams, clients, etc
The first 5 mins of your conf call / meeting are sometimes just spent troubleshooting for guests.
Our goal was to fix that and illustrate just how simple & fast it can be :)
Wow, and that's the norm for a 5 billion dollar industry? Well, considering Microsoft just bought Skype for 8 billion you should be in pretty good shape...
I created an account. It's a very neat interface. I'll try to use it in a meeting soon.
I was expecting some kind of racing game in canvas or destroying elements in the DOM, something like that...
When I pinged our CTO his tounge in cheek response: "we are software engineers. we like to irritate people."
This is the kind of fun stuff we get to learn in beta - will see about getting that fixed!
Expect to see more on the build process, the tech, how we made it into LAUNCH at the last minute, etc in the future here - appreciate all the HN support and please send any and all feedback here or through the feedback list once you log in.
I also wonder how important is extra 15-25 seconds worth as far as online meetings are concerned (which usually last for >30 minutes).
Personally, I didn't like the video all too much, I felt the comparison was somewhat deceptive. As a GoToMeeting subscriber I can usually start a meeting in less than 5 seconds, since I already have the client installed. Clearly, if I don't have the client, then it's a longer process with website -> download -> run/install, as such the video, for me, takes something away from your product. While the speed comparison is nice, and something that should be emphasized, I believe the other aspects of MeetingBurner stand on their own.
I feel that the one-touch recording, the no-client download, online access to your recordings, shareable links, and clear reporting to your past meetings already goes beyond what your competitors offer.
I really like GoToMeeting as it's clean, robust, has recording and numerous other niceties, however, it is lacking in certain areas and having a full web solution like MeetingBurner would be ideal.
I will definitely try it out in GoToMeeting's place over the next couple of days and provide whatever additional feedback I can.
[edit: grammar]
We struggled with what to highlight, and in a future blog post we'll address why we focused on that screen record.
Looking forward to your additional comments - submit via the MB helpdesk (feel free to repost here too) to make sure we see everything.