A 73-year-old Japanese artist took YouTube by storm
edition.cnn.com
edition.cnn.com
Along similar lines I would like to recommend Ishitani Furniture's Youtube channel. The videos are not tutorials like Shibasaki's but it is a joy to watch Natsuki Ishitani make made-to-order furniture. Equally good videography and editing by Chie.
I know it's not classical art, but I think it's still rather artistic to re-imagine a knife with new materials.
I mean I guess if you skimmed the title briefly I could see how. But to me that guy seems not comparatively popular on YouTube (and title was talking about taking the world by storm), and working with a Japanese medium and living in Japan still isn’t the association I have when title says Japanese Bob Ross.
He was very nice and quietly energetic and funny and obviously passionate about his craft -- exactly as he is on his videos. He was taking a break for lunch and has his shop closed for a bit. We said we'd be back but ran out of time and never made it back to his place when it was open.
It was an odd juxtaposition to walk about a block away and be confronted with the cacophony of the local Don Quijoti.
Unlike what the article claims, the resurgence of Bob Ross popularity on VoD/streaming has very little to do with the pandemic but has already been a thing for many years due to Twitch streaming Bob Ross's The Joy of Painting [0].
And while most Twitch chats are toxic dumpster fires, a surprisingly wholesome community grew around that Bob Ross channel.
[0] https://techcrunch.com/2015/11/09/after-pulling-in-5-6m-view...
One note: if you are inspired to try watercolor after seeing this article/videos, don't be discouraged if you struggle. Watercolor seems easy (that's what kids do, right?) but it's very difficult to master.
Bob Ross was a wonderful figure who democratized the act of painting to the mass consumer demographic. The level of fame he attained is much higher than the quality of his paintings.
I'm simply contrasting the level of fame Ross achieved, to his level of art. They are not equivalent at all. His paintings are of rather low quality.
I'm not saying Ross' painting is as bad as this extreme example, but to even a casual appreciator of world class art, Ross' paintings are of very amateurish quality. The stuff you'd see hung in a motel breakfast corner for example.
I've seen plenty of motel paintings, watched plenty of Bob Ross episodes, but the comparison doesn't seem fair. Motel paintings are often printed - you can tell by the CMYK dots if you come close enough. Ross at least seems to use actual oil paint on canvas supported by real solvents which seems a lot higher quality than the usual school process using acrylics or temperas. (Although granted using liquid white seems a bit dodgy).
So what is Ross missing. Not enough detail? Does not take enough time to paint a painting? Not enough paint on the canvas? Not photorealistic enough? Too photorealistic?
I would apply the uncanny valley dynamic to his landscape paintings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley
I’d say he certainly was an artist. If he was a good artist or not is a matter of opinion. Certainly from a technical and conceptual point of view there’s good argument he wasn’t exceptional. But certainly his work, or the labor of his work, has been appreciated by many.
How do you become an artist? Make art and say you are an artist. How do you become a professional artist? Have someone pay you to make art. I'd say he qualifies.
Maybe not professional artists where we get paid to partake in our creative outlets.
On the other hand, Vincent Van Gogh only sold a single painting in his lifetime.
Bob Ross was more professional artist than most. He is still widely known for his work teaching people how to create new creative works.
I agree. You summarized my point much better