Leaked Government UFO Photo: What Is Hovering Cube-Shaped Object?
popularmechanics.com
popularmechanics.com
It is much easier to argue how an artefact could be injected into a digital image than to explain how the digital phenomenon itself could exist yet speculation about these things almost always centres around physical phenomenon and lighting effects. It is commonly assumed that the image taken by the image sensor is what people are seeing when there is no reason to believe this outright.
The object in the photo has been described by U.S. officials as silver and “cube-shaped,” according to a report from The Debrief, which first shared the image.
which is ridiculous because it's clearly not. Are they talking about a totally different photo I wonder? Later in the article the guy who took the photo is quoted as saying:
It’s likely that a backseat weapons system operator on an F/A-18F Super Hornet took the photo of the object, which McMillan calls “inverted” and “bell-shaped,” and describes it having “ridges or other protrusions along its lateral edges, extending toward its base.”
So there's something seriously wrong with this article.
https://image.made-in-china.com/43f34j00IHgGJdWhCMca/Dto0224...
An interesting statement. The observers were in a fast aircraft. How long did they circle the object before they noticed it was not drifting with the wind?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWWGmiZs4JA
and
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/F-...
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/are-the-navy-ufos-real-or-j...
UFOs are certainly real but they probably aren’t extraterrestrial if you consider Occam’s razor.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-r...
2. Take a picture of a flying object through your window or windshield while riding shotgun in a car, at speed.
3. Show us sharp the picture is
That’s my point. Timing, preparation, and some good luck (eg with weather) are all more important than gear, which I think answers OP’s statement