That'll be because Apple products use a custom protocol to iPhones, whereas all other brands have to use basic bluetooth, which has crappy sound quality, arbitrary restrictions, poor handling of weak signals, lots of delay, and is hard to pair.
Apples walled garden doesn't allow third parties to design or use their own protocols, or use apples protocols, so it's far from a level playing field.
But yes, on iPhone Apple exploits their position to kneecap competitors.
They require a special license to use, and require dedicated hardware (ie. they won't connect to a phone). Shows whats possible if walled garden and regulatory constraints are lifted though.
What on earth? Because of the transmission spectrum they use?
Also, a lot of movie stuff, especially at budgets below AAA box office extravaganzas, still use wired gear. Zero latency, no potential audio loss, and dirt cheap.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
> Is irregardless a word?
> Yes. It may not be a word that you like, or a word that you would use in a term paper, but irregardless certainly is a word. It has been in use for well over 200 years, employed by a large number of people across a wide geographic range and with a consistent meaning. That is why we, and well-nigh every other dictionary of modern English, define this word. Remember that a definition is not an endorsement of a word’s use.
It's for when it's really important to express that it doesn't matter.
(kidding, of course)
Now do "funnily", a non-word which I dislike with a consuming passion.