Found myself in a situation needing it a few weeks ago and was like, ugh, what do I do now.
Found myself in a situation needing it a few weeks ago and was like, ugh, what do I do now.
If Firefox had used something other than firefox.com the brand trust could be decoupled from the service but by offering it for free they received PR. Catch 22 I think.
The nature of Mozilla not having access to the files eliminated any sort of scanning/vetting and malicious actors quickly exploited it.
If Firefox had decided to charge for send I’m sure fraudulent payments would have been used to procure accounts intended for malware. That could have helped expire out malicious links before unsuspecting users clicked them but it wouldn’t have completely addressed the issue.
I guess this is why most no-account file hosting is on sketchy sites.
ffsend uses this host, but I don't widely advertise it's address to prevent overloading the server with spam.
I think a decade ago I started paying ~5$ a month for a server at OVH with a lot of storage. SSH/Filezilla, Nginx on an obfuscated URL, has solved a lot of my problems. I also use it as a server to test docker images, a VPN when I want a French IP, a pictures backup server and a professional presentation website.
My free email account I am using since the 90s is now telling me it is almost full so I am considering to switch it.
Really, storage is cheap but is not free. Save yourself a lot of hassle: pay it yourself, take back control.
Do you think that would be useful to many people?