On the other hand landlords compete for tenants. So they may want to allow pets but impose a surcharge for the potential damage.
On the other hand landlords compete for tenants. So they may want to allow pets but impose a surcharge for the potential damage.
You'd have the same issues with tenants that were excessively noisy, or held parties and spilled alcohol in the hallways, or scratched doors/walls/floors from moving bikes, furniture, etc. So it seems inconsistent to apply the nonrefundable fee only to the case of pets.
https://www.wndu.com/content/news/Dowagiac-house-fire-sparke...
https://www.myarklamiss.com/louisiana-news/child-playing-wit...
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/23/child-linked-...
https://www.fox13now.com/2015/07/25/fire-crews-respond-to-2-...
https://www.ajc.com/news/local/kids-playing-with-lighters-ca...
Pets don’t make the news when they ruin dwelling places, as it is relatively common compared to that.