£100K is a minimum for most of the financial tech recruiters, for senior hires. At least I chat to quite a few of them and there doesn't seem to be anything under. Typical build-a-market-connector jobs.
Also there's a big contracting market where people will pay £600-£2000 a day, depending on what you do. They're semi-permanent jobs that superficially seem to be temporary, but something about how banks are organised makes them feel more permanent.
£500k as a salary is rare, most comp at that level is some sort of bonus.
I've heard of banks that hire people in at ordinary day rates, but then once they are familiar with the person will bump the rate to whatever.
It's tapered from 100 to 125k, but at no point is your employer paying 100% tax. From 100 to 125k, your marginal tax rate is ~60%, but drops after that point.
> £500k as a salary is rare, most comp at that level is some sort of bonus.
Even with bonuses, or RSU/some other form of shares, I think "rare" is understating it, and that's exactly the point. The discussion in this thread is that the top performers in FAANG are clearing _well_ above these values (multiples of these numbers).
> once they are familiar with the person will bump the rate to whatever.
Can you be a little more clear with the "whatever" number? 100k? 500k? 1m?
Actually you're right, I had misunderstood something. Looking at an online calculator, if you go from 100K to 125K gross, you take home 10K more.
Most of the >£100k permanent (not contract) jobs I see have "Architect" in the title which typically means not just coding.
As an additional note, the UK contracting market is on a precipice at the moment with an uncertain future.
> but it is extremely rare.
I'd expect so, and it seems this is rare in the US too, (this is literally the top of top performers at the top companies), but you'd expect to have _some_ indication of this information leakign out.
> Most of the >£100k permanent (not contract) jobs I see have "Architect" in the title which typically means not just coding.
Any idea on the 500k+ roles? (e.g. this post).
Architecture is something to reason about as a team and the accountability of architecturally significant decisions seems to rest with the team also.
The >$500k roles seem to just be the upper echelons of a software engineer role.
I know that at Facebook the ballpark salary for something approximating senior is approx £100k. I think a range between around £60k to £110k is in line with what i've seen on offer for senior (source: i've spent most of this year looking for work, and this is pretty much what i've seen)
It depends far more on the company than anything else. I've seen engineers earning over £120k that wouldn't have been able to get hired as senior at my last role, where the senior salary was in the £70-80k range.
FB/Google/Microsoft seem to be in the 80-100k ballpark for senior engineers.
Wage stagnation for the last 15 or so years.
Meanwhile things get more expensive and we are in a recession.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-02/australia-september-q...
£100k is easy to achieve in pretty much any faang - https://www.levels.fyi/comp.html?track=Software%20Engineer&s...
My first software engineering job in London in 2011 was arguably $1m/year, if I'd hung on to the equity until now!