Example of YouTube saying they will ban vit. c videos using the "misinformation" label: https://twitter.com/i/status/1252676099169038337
Vit. c is known to be a potent immune booster. So this is a real head scratcher.
Example of YouTube saying they will ban vit. c videos using the "misinformation" label: https://twitter.com/i/status/1252676099169038337
Vit. c is known to be a potent immune booster. So this is a real head scratcher.
The "misinformation" people are battling is about a) unsubstantiated health claims and b) the fact that supplement manufacturers don't need to provide any evidence or follow any regulations regarding what's actually in the supplements. That means they can say they're selling e.g. Vitamin C but it's just sugar.
John Oliver has a good video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA0wKeokWUU
Crude I stopped eating for a month to kill it off. (Not intentional)
Worked great. Don’t recommend.
Yes, there is. You could have done a quick search on Google Scholar to confirm this, example:
A mathematical model showing the potential of vitamin c to boost the innate immune response
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anuraag_Bukkuri/publica...
Vitamins: Key Role Players in Boosting Up Immune Response-A Mini Review
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jazib_Irfan/publication...
Use of vitamin C as an immunostimulant. Effect on growth, nutritional quality, and immune response of Labeo rohita (Ham.)
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10695-007-9184-...
> the "misinformation" people are battling is about a) unsubstantiated health claims
That "substantiation" requires a $2 billion payout to the FDA to certify.
> the fact that supplement manufacturers don't need to provide any evidence or follow any regulations regarding what's actually in the supplements.
Obviously you have no idea what you are talking about.