Hacker News Reader

>Not to take away from the argument that we should vaccinate everyone.

I'm not sure if this is a concession for argument's sake, but imo it does take away from it. Why do you think it doesn't?

View on HN

It doesn't take away from it because it's never been a good argument. x - 0 still equals x.

There are plenty of valid arguments to vaccinate everyone we can.

I'm not sure what you mean by x-0, but if there is no risk for young healthy people, then they don't need the vaccine? I understand there are other arguments to be had but this 100% invalidates at least on of them

EDIT: After re-reading I understood the sentence, my bad.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com