Yet it is still incredibly misleading and dishonest.
That should really teach you something about relying on the style of presentation for judging whether a claim is reasonable. In this case, it's garbage.
That should really teach you something about relying on the style of presentation for judging whether a claim is reasonable. In this case, it's garbage.
This is a subject where incorrect information is actually endangering lives. Why keep this up, when it is known to be wrong?
That, to me, implies malice. I do not see any other way to interpret that.