Spy in the Sky – The KH-9 Hexagon (2014)
podcasts.google.com
podcasts.google.com
With the Hubble Space Telescope for example we have one example of a design that's extremely similar to a 90's era KH-11 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennen ) pointing outwards at the stars. We have dozens more, including newer, 30 years more advanced designs of spy satellites pointing inwards. That's pretty depressing. I get that defense is a requirement but our biggest scientific projects are essentially just offcuts of military tech with its unlimited budgets. Imagine if the space telescopes had similar budgets to spy satellites.
[B] It's on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmWlw8Ufo6Q
That said, optical imaging satellites are amazing.
tl;dr - the satellite would drop "buckets" with exposed film from orbit, and the US Air Force would catch them mid-air over the Pacific ocean.
Some good details and photos here: https://spie.org/news/spie-professional-magazine-archive/201...
I was at Udvar-Hazy back in 2013 and I guess I completely missed the KH-9 because I was in a hurry so I sort of ran through the place mostly to see the Blackbird and the Space Shuttle.. I guess I'll just have to go back!
The article I linked shows that they used Hercules aircraft to catch the buckets as they parachuted down back towards the water...
You can't just "drop" something from a satellite that's in orbit: it will also stay in orbit. So you need something to slow it down enough that goes low enough to start re-entry.
Then there's the whole problem of re-entry. You can't just drop something and expect it to survive re-entry without burning up in the atmosphere unless it has things like a heat shield and a way of keeping the heat shield oriented so that it keeps acting like a heat shield.
The missing details may be in the referenced book, but either way there certainly are some.