They're not fonts
aiga.org
aiga.org
And actually, "what font did you use" is correct you arrogant jackass, at least using the definition that you gave. Or are you designing PDFs using a letterpress?
Alas.. someone somewhere is calling their computer a hard drive and that would cause me to shudder. :)
If he's going to go full pedant on this, he might as well disregard the word altogether.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Font
"In typography, a font (also fount) is traditionally defined as a quantity of sorts composing a complete character set of a single size and style of a particular typeface."
Why is this important? Now that typefaces are embedded in the web we'll see the typography become more and more sophisticated. So it's important for techies to really learn the language of typography. Also since we're seeing amazing advances in screen resolution we can really start to show several weights of a typeface at a very small size.
In fact my bet is that as we see resolution increase we'll start to embrace vastly improved typography. In the old days the cut of a typeface at 72 points was different than the same typeface at 12 points -- so the typeface wasn't just auto-scaling up and down in size by stretching it. My bet is that we'll see a real revolution in the next few years in this area.
Song : MP3 :: Typeface : Font
I agree, though, that making a big deal out of people getting it wrong is a sign of insecurity and pretentiousness.
I suspect the reason is the same as with font in English — it's the only term that Word (and its predecessors) used for everything font/typeface related.
The battle is lost.