Open Education Resources
mindshift.kqed.org
mindshift.kqed.org
minor grumble: why, why, WHY do so many universities put their content on ItunesU, thus making it all but inaccessible for those of us not already using apple software.
Even dumping a pile of MP3s on a server somewhere would make your material much more accessible.
The actual content is in fact still stored on the school's server, just as you say -- a very common way of populating iTunes U is through RSS feeds from some internal system (not necessarily Apple-based).
If the content is free, there's no reason why they shouldn't make it available through alternate links/feeds. You could try complaining to the person in charge. :-)
http://www.ubuntugeek.com/tunesviewer-itunes-university-medi...
http://www.fritscher.ch/blog/2009/05/13/browsing-itunesu-wit...
It's just that he chooses areas to cover based on feedback from students/users - and if enough students approach him, the subject gets magically covered.
http://www.reddit.com/r/csbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/mathbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/eebooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/physicsbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/econbooks
And, of course, there is this classic site:
http://people.math.gatech.edu/~cain/textbooks/onlinebooks.ht...
Not worth your time.
Degrade gracefully, and let the client see something of what you have to offer. They might actually decide it's worth their while, and gather sufficient trust, to enable Javascript.
I keep JS disabled because there's just too much random/nasty cr*p out there. I'll do JS for some sites, but it's definitely "opt-in", for me.
Yeah, I'm a corner case. I just found the deliberate redirect away from a presentable page (with JS disabled) to a content-devoid warning/advisory, to be rather pointless, from my perspective.