I have no answers though, I was sure not drinking, and being on chemo therapy all year would help me lose weight, but somehow I gained.
I have no answers though, I was sure not drinking, and being on chemo therapy all year would help me lose weight, but somehow I gained.
The author of this blog post made a simple mistake: he thought that if he had big muscles, he would burn a lot of calories even when sitting still. That doesn’t happen.
The only way to burn a lot of calories is to do a lot of physical activity.
Edit to add: controlling diet is more effective than adding activity for most people in rich western societies because most of those people do not have the time, inclination, or opportunity to do a lot of hard physical activity every day.
I'm not sure if this is your point, but if your "calories in" stayed the same, and "calories out" significantly decreased, it's expected that you would continually gain bodyfat until you reach a new equilibrium point. That seems to have been what's happened.
If the amount of exercise changes, your diet should optimally change with it - but perfectly managing your habits in this way is hard.
For example, if you walk for 8+ hours per day, as people do when thru hiking, you will struggle to maintain bodyweight. Hikers spend a lot of time thinking about the most energy dense foods they can take with them to fuel their activity, which is low intensity but sufficiently high in volume that it drastically increases their energy expenditure due to activity.
The description of your own experience is most simply explained by your usual diet putting you into a caloric surplus at your current activity levels, whereas when you were more active it was just enough to maintain or put you into a small deficit regularly.
And definitely agree about the athlete diets--I was skinny all my life until I stopped playing sports 3-4 times a week. Oh, I also met my wonderful friend called beer, which certainly didn't help. Good luck with your own journey!