Normalizing the data might indeed show that Asian males do even "worse" in online dating. But how dismissive Rudder was of the need to normalize that data was surprising and a bit disturbing as some many people take what is presented as fact and possibly draw incorrect conclusions. I would not be surprised if normalizing for height did account for some of it, but the data should be available so outside people can run their own tests. (and half jokingly, as someone who wears glasses, normalizing for that as well).

As for education and kids, I can see how that can explain the difference between Asian women and Black women's response rate. But again, need a real examination of the data.

It is a very touchy subject, which is unfortunately plagued by both uninformed people and also those who just want to cause pain to to others.

I don't know what point you are trying to make. I said everything that was relevant.

If your numbering system introduced only now in this reply is regarding physical attractiveness, then women don't have this issue in their own race.

The point is that this doesn't help asian men because it barely makes a dent in the pool of asian men that would ever be exposed to a women with this predilection, as her pool is so much larger and also includes asian men. Even if her pool only included asian men in this strategy, from the perspective of the men, nothing has changed because the odds they will be exposed to it are slim.

My reply is only about the men's UX, not your "arbitrage" from the woman's UX.

If there was an objective score for attractiveness then women would rate men of the same race +1 higher than the objective rating. There are probably more men of the preferred race at 7 than there are men at 8 for all races.

>why do I care if the other males notice

This is how I can tell you're not a woman.