Especially when you think a lot of disabled people can not afford to drive or use taxis.
Eg. Drop kerbs are frequently missing, cars frequently park on pavements (sidewalks), limited formal crossing points.
Especially when you think a lot of disabled people can not afford to drive or use taxis.
Eg. Drop kerbs are frequently missing, cars frequently park on pavements (sidewalks), limited formal crossing points.
While ADA access is important, it is not often the most important thing. But the lawsuits are forcing $100+ million settlements that take any prioritization of resources out of the hands of local voters or local legislatures.
Why spend $300million on sidewalks 'right now' when other services may be more effective (e.g., on demand shuttles, etc.)
Yes, there are curb cuts. But, the sidewalk only exists on one side of a 4-lane road. Or worse, the sidewalks jumps back and forth, forcing frequent road crossings.
Or, there are curb cuts and sidewalks, but no crossing signal on a 40mph road (where actually flow is closer to 50mph).
The buildings might be accessible, but you have to get across acres of parking lot and dodge distracted driers pulling in/out of spaces.
Lots of room for improvement.