Indian government blocks access to forty-three mobile apps
pib.gov.in
pib.gov.in
most people forget that india has been one of the most vocal countries regarding the persecution of the chinese muslim population. more so than for example turkey, pakistan, saudi, even US and EU has not said much about the muslims being put into concentration camps.
i would say blocking apps and starting sanctions would be the logical steps to take. much better than waging war i would say.
(I don't want to diminish the awful things going on in Xinjiang, but I think giving the rest of what Modi does this would be more cynically down by the Indian government than you make it out to be.)
not sure what any of that had to do with what i said, i was not trying to make out anything. i was simply stating that something that can be added to this perspective regarding OPs post, is that there are simultaneous forces at play. you do understand that two things can happen at the same time right? one does not negate another?
This seems like a strange qualification considering the Line of Actual Control (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_Actual_Control) hasn't changed since 1959. Even after the war of 1962, the Chinese side withdrew back to the 1959 line of control. How does China execute a "land grab" while never crossing the line of control according to Modi? (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did...)
Yes, I'm quibbling about words. In politics words aren't separate from reality.
Having said that, The Great Firewall is the best thing CCP has done to protect itself, by a long shot. Had it not done so, China would be, at best, full of riots and uprisings and protests everywhere as foreign interests mobilized locals to act against the CCP using anti-CCP propaganda in their social media.
South Korea has had installed leaders since the Korean War.
The US hated Shinzo Abe for the longest damn time, didn't stop him from being re-elected multiple times.
Also, its not appropriate to call the forces still in Japan an "occupying army". There is a joint forces treaty in place, and Japan has multiple times refused to amend Article 9 of their constitution
In South Korea, they've deposed the previous President. Seems like the US is doing a bad job installing leaders there.
its alive an kicking already
So it’s curious to see the selective retaliation. At what point a company is Chinese?
PayTM raked in immense profit following demonetization in India(overnight invalidation of several currency notes). And it continues to handle large amounts of financial transactions on daily basis.
Just the way we have import/export sanctions, I can see why we have similar gates for the Internet.
If we really want the promise of Internet to live on, then we ought to invest in more decentralized technology. Push for mobile OSs allowing other apps. As long as the reigns are controlled by only a few Mega corps, we are at risk.
Our mobile phones are an extension of who we are, but they aren’t owned by us.
If I could find my electronics elsewhere and for a reasonable price, I would choose that but I can't. Government butchered the manufacturing industry, imposed ridiculous taxes (even increased them during the pandemic), custom duties and all sort of red tape which makes education for young generation harder. How can individuals work on the next generation robots, electronics, whatever if you can't even get decent micro controllers and brushless motors in india?
And it's not like big indian companies aren't selling data back to china. Majority of unicorns in india are taking investment from China. Paytm is china funded. Why don't they ban any investment from China?
This is a bad analogy.
Oil is a commodity. Data are not. Oil is extractive. You can fly in tech and talent, pump oil, keep the rulers happy and not concern yourself with the local population. You can’t do that with data—its value, for advertising and influencing, is linked to the population’s productivity and power. Finally, data are ephemeral in a way oil isn’t. You can’t barrel up bytes in the middle of the ocean.
https://news.microsoft.com/innovation-stories/project-natick...
>These data are subjected to sophisticated analyses to manufacture 'prediction products,' and are then sold into what I call new 'markets in future behavior.' Huge revenues flow from these new markets.
>The logic of this new capitalism is that we are raw material resources. We are not the 'ends' of the process but rather the 'means' of the revenue process. It is 'about' us, but not 'for' us.
https://sciencenode.org/feature/shoshana-zuboff,-part-two-re...
The oil analogy works for me.
>You can fly in tech and talent, pump oil, keep the rulers happy and not concern yourself with the local population.
Check.
>(Data's) value, for advertising and influencing, is linked to the population’s productivity and power.
You can still sell oil in Tonga, a country with very low GDP, but you won't make as much as if you sold out somewhere else. In fact if you're selling oil and you leave out the niche cases, you are losing money.
>Finally, data are ephemeral in a way oil isn’t. You can’t barrel up bytes in the middle of the ocean.
Places have tried to make laws to make data ephemeral, because it is generally not: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten
What is with programmers and their utter failure to understand an analogy, is it their literal mind? Is it the lack of socialization when growing up?. "Data is the new oil" just means that it is an important economical and political asset, that's it that's the extend of the analogy.Nobody is thinking about API degrees, viscosity, sulfur content, etc. For the purpose intended the analogy works. I am pretty sure you could come up with a better analogy (Data is a car, in true Slashdot style) but watch like not even 5 min later another guy will come up to pick your analogy apart with the most literal of interpretations.
In my special hell I am doomed to take literature classes with a bunch of programmers.
“Data is the new oil” is used by Reliance, an oil company. It may be you who isn’t thinking deeply enough.
The analogy is bad because oil has a specific geopolitical history. That history was caused, in part, by oil’s nature as an extracted nonperishable commodity. Opining on policy with respect to consumer data, a non-extractive, perishable differentiated good, with reference to oil reserves is misguided. Oil also has a specific national history in India. One that involved the state investing in, protecting and buying through domestic middlemen.
“Data is the new oil” is a different message from e.g. “data is the new gold.” It advocates porting a specific regulatory regime to India’s digital economy. One featuring politically-connected national champions.
So what?, it is used by thousand of companies. Hell, the guy who supposedly come up with it worked for Tesco, so he should have used meat or milk.
> It may be you who isn’t thinking deeply enough.
That's the point, you get the general sense of the idea, maybe chuckle at the marketking-hype speak and move on, you dont try to over-analyze if iron, land or tulips were a marginally better option.
The rest of your comment will be sent to pseud's corner
User 1: A is like B
User 2: Wrong! Here is a very detailed description of why A is not literally and exactly B, therefore A is not like B.
You can find this pattern over and over in the comments section. If you ever want to generate a giant tree of pedantic, nitpicky responses here, simply post a car analogy, and let the programmers do the rest of the writing.
Unless you're talking about the government putting its own interests above the people's, which makes sense.
Its obvious to their best interest that the one that profit is an Indian company, with ties to the government.
As a consequence, the app may be free in theory, but the Support and other contracts cost a lot of money. As it is often said Linux is free if your time has no value.
Being based in Shanghai, CN.
All these scanning apps sent every scan to remote servers. Passports, Aadhar Cards, and all docs were uploaded by these apps.
#massivespeculation
Real baller move would be to ban anything with a China built SoC, if at all hatred for China is a reason to begin with.
The UK is not hell-bent on banning Huawei. It had initially approved Huawei hardware, and after banning them, admitted that this was due to geopolitical pressure,[1] which included US threats to reduce intelligence co-operation with the UK.[2] The US president even said that he was responsible for the UK's action.[3]
1. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/18/pressure-...
2. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/31/trump-to-threaten-to-curb-in...
3. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2020/jul/15/tru...
Because the US has a trade war with China and tries to rope other countries into it?
Second, just because lalamove didn't do anything ontoward for you, doesn't mean that chinese companies don't spy on anyone. Maybe you should look at the rich history of china's industrial espionage, or how US and Soviet Russia spied on each other during the cold war.
Third, this is part of a economic and trade war against china. Maybe you should read about how an authoritarian state works, and how subjugated people get treated by oppressors. Go look at tibet, taiwan, Hong Kong, uyghur, ww2 poland etc etc.
I'll add a final point. I have found most such arguments made by people who hate the current indian government, which is indeed a bad one. But people are so hell bent on opposing the government that they even speak positives of entities that are against india, like china. Food for thought for you, what would your reaction be if it was the indian government doing similar things of industrial espionage, economic war, and spying. Would you say that modi was welcome to see that you ordered furniture from ikea?
Right but they are not looking for a baller move. India has severely limited financial , military or technical capabilities compare to China. They can't really challenge in significant way, so banning chinese hardware, capital investment in startups or military action is out of question. Banning some phone apps and calling it a strong retaliatory move against chinese aggression is the story fed by politicians.
Page counter was very prevalent during that era.
Good bye innovation by many and welcome monopoly by crony.
Free is never one sided. So us trade.
IMO the great firewall of China is a stumbling block in the path to world peace.
If we all know someone everywhere in the world then how will our governments convince us to attack them if our friends live there?
Its a matter of information logistics and applied correctly; people like people. Its when people quarantine information and selectively release it (e.g. only negative information) that tribalism can grow.