Drinking coffee or tea from paper cups may be bad for your health
studyfinds.org
studyfinds.org
Seriously, I am looking. So far every study I have found — linking micro-plastics to physical harm done to multicellular organisms — had the phrase "potential" (or a derivative) in it.
I dislike plastic as much as the next guy, but I slowly get the feeling: the harmful effects of plastic have the same level of scientific proof as harm caused by radiation of mobile phones — inconclusive to likely _none_.
When dealing with probabilities there are two measures that need to be considered independently: probability and effect. Traditional statistics multiplies them into "expected utility" and works just with the aggregated value. But that's tricky, because effect is not a continuous function. Imagine a pebble falling on your head plotted based on its weight - there'll be sharp discontinuities at "hurts", "commotion" and "death".
At society's level there are also similar discontinuities. Something that may cause tens of million of cases of cancer over time should be in a separate category from a medicine that may suddenly kill a few hundred people, even though the latter has a bigger emotional impact.
I've seen so many photos of dead fish filled with plastic that it must be a concern to the food supply chain.
And absence of evidence != evidence of absence.
The most important is hormone-like compounds like Bisphenol A (BPA) because hormones are chemical compounds that are used as signals and its effect cascade multiplied by billions in the body, so super small amounts can affect you enormously.
They are being replaced, but new compounds also have hormone like response.
Because biology works by "shape is function" lots of chemical compounds can affect your body because they resemble the one we need for our body's normal function, and the body receptors are confused.
This has extensively been proven that happens, what we don't know is what dose could be ok. For example, you can use(without problems) fleece outside clothing if there is not a big part of your skin in contact with the fleece, like what happened with kid's pajamas, that was very problematic.
Probing that on humans is something similar to covid vaccine testing. It is extremely expensive and bureaucratic process and only gives us statistical results. Knowing exactly what happened is extremely difficult or impossible in practice because there are hundreds of chemical compounds, and they interfere with each other creating factorial combinations. But we know it breaks havoc in your body for sure.
You also should avoid heat because it makes chemical diffusion exponentially higher. When you eat your soda can, the PET layer,is at ambient temperature. When you eat coffee or tea, it is hot.
Microplastics that have been generated from plastics containing BPA that are then lodged into the food chain from a very low level will have serious consequences, as BPA is an endocrine disrupter, and shown to negatively affect many physiologial systems including human sperm [1].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A [1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S08906...
edit for context:
In practice several plastics compounds are chemically too 'similar' to estrogen (the 'female' hormone).
The plastics with these estrogen like compounds typical either mechanically breakdown (microplastics) or leach due to chemical breakdown (e.g. caused by contact with high temperature liquids or acidic solutions).
Once absorbed it may confuse your body as a 'pseudo estrogen' hormone. This acts as an endocrine disruptor, potentially more so for Males of animal species because of their hormonal profile.
Glass, silicone and plant-based materials are the logical solution here
We used glass bottles for milk when our kids were young. The only people to ever break them was us: around 3 total during the course of raising 3 kids.
At work I have a glass mug for coffee, but I still use paper cups for water. If I replace it with glass it means I will now have 2 things to wash.
What about the dish washer? Isn’t that convenient? If it is environmentally friendly or not that’s another question.
Glasses are great, and have some wonderful properties, but so do the the various plastics–they’re responsible for raising living standards for millions of people.
It's effects on people's hormones are just starting to be understood and known.
Wood and metal utensils just feel better in the hand than plastic ones.
I'm not sure whether the eureka moment you're talking about has already happened, with our discovery of just how prevalent microplastics are everywhere in the environment now.
The only plastics in kitchen necessary for me are cling wraps. There are a few other hings out of my control: the nob of the pot lid and the dish soap container. But they all have viable alternatives if the manufacturers are willing.
Plastic cups, plates, bowls are unsafe close to heat sources, a lot harder to clean than everything else, and just feels cheap. I really don't get the popularity of plastics in kitchen.
When the harmful effects of asbestos were first learned, sick and dead people showed up and then a relationship between asbestos dose and illness was subsequently established.
In summary, paper is not the problem here.
First of all bio-polymers is nothing new and revolutionary. The first plastics where bio-polymers like bakelite made from cellulose. The only reason we started making polymers from oil is because it's a rest product from the oil-industry and thus cheap but the inherent properties of polymers are the same whether they come from oil or plants and they typically don't break down in nature. The only positive thing with plant based polymers is that they could to some degree be considered carbon neutral.
But there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding that keeps spreading because we inherently think bio-polymers should be bio-degradable because they are made from organic material. There is one bio-based polymer in particular, PLA that is actually said to be bio-degredable and used in paper cups but this is in industrial facilities and not in nature where the degrading process is at lest 70 years under optimal circumstances.
And there are more problems with polymers then just the fact that they don't brake down in nature. They contain toxic and endocrine disrupting chemicals like BPA.
Less than 0.2 inches across huh...technically true I suppose.
https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2016/10/26/kolkatas-age-ol...
While it still a valuable discover, I think it's too early to make any conclusions yet due to fairly limited source.
Sample B seems to have vastly mode copper and manganese leaching out than the other samples.
https://www.fastcompany.com/90520298/how-dixie-cups-became-t...
If it's one of the recently trendy 'bamboo' cups, I'm fairly certain most of them are made of predominately with melamine.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/reusable-bamboo-mugs-lea...
> Overall, the BfR tested 228 bamboo mugs for formaldehyde and 180 for melamine. In each case, more than 35% of the cups released harmful substances in amounts that surpassed safety limits. Moreover, the amount of melamine – but not formaldehyde – the mugs released increased with repeated exposure to hot and slightly acidic liquids.
https://bluebottlecoffee.com/store/blue-bottle-x-ecoffee-cup
If you can avoid both at the same time, terrific! If you can only avoid one, avoid the germs. They will kill you faster.
(Ideally, you also work at reducing/limiting how much exposure you have to the thing poisoning you. Edit: One possible solution here is to drink your coffee cold, such as frappuccino drinks. Even in the same cup, it should be far less of an issue.)
We’re in the grip of anti-plastic mania, to the extent that when heavy metals are discovered in a beverage container, the focus is inevitably on microplastics.
Since we’ve no idea who manufactured these containers, and since they contain heavy metals, I’m going to suggest that they didn’t come from the likes of Starbucks.
Of course, none of that has prevented me consuming as much coffee from disposable cups as the average urban professional type...
Seems only one of these can be true.