Hacker News Reader

Comment by zbowling | Hacker News Reader

Violation of government accessibility requirements. Oh and it's horribly compressed (150k+ IIRC), text stored on a JPEG (PNG is so much better for graphics), not hosted on a CDN, lacks etags so there is no caching, and the background image of the "seized" text in red is just as bad. Wasting my tax money on massive bandwidth drain to host the page and wastes my bandwidth caps to load it. Makes me angry.

View on HN

> Violation of government accessibility requirements.

I've always wondered if they could be sued for that.

I'll throw in a few bucks if you want to try.

IANAL and don't have the time to arrange something like this or I would def try.

PS: I would throw money someone's way to do this too.

It may violate the ADA, but the lack of accessibility only prevents a visitor from benefiting from the DHS's message, not a site that they would otherwise use without trouble (as is done for IRL ADA complaints). Even if someone could get in front of a judge with this, I'm sure the DHS has absolute immunity for stuff like this.

If they can't see, they can't be told what this image says on the page, the only image on the page. Imagine if there were important information in it or something other than just a warning.

Imagine if there were important information in it or something other than just a warning.

Sure, but there isn't. :)

Don't think they'll find anyone willing to contribute design effort. No graphic designer would want to add this page to their Design Portfolio.

If I did graphics design, I would have no problem with it -- heck, I would even tell people about it :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com