Understanding LCD Monitor Color Gamuts
eizo.com
eizo.com
These wide-gamut monitors have both a deeper red source (longer wavelength) and a deeper green (shorter). So the red and green peaks are quite a bit farther apart -- possibly as much as 80% -- than they are with a standard CCFL or WLED backlight. Combine that with high-index plastic lenses, which have higher dispersion (a measure of chromatic aberration) the higher their refractive index, and you can get a real problem.
Since my correction is about -6.75 diopters, and I have wide-gamut monitors, I had a pair of glasses made with CR-39, a relatively low-index plastic with low dispersion, almost as low as that of glass. CR-39 is generally not used for such strong lenses because they would need to be thick at the edges, but this problem can be minimized by making the lens round in shape and not too large.
I have a touch less than 3 diopters of astigmatism, and have difficulty with chromatic aberation already, especially with pictures made only of red and blue (such as some micrographs with various fluorescents).
RGB led indicators also get resolved into a red and adjacent blue dot with some frequency (no pun intended).
It is worse since aging, presbyopia, and switching to progressive lenses, even with only 1.25 to 1.75 of near vision correction.
Charging the same prices for items of inferior quality is one way capitalism can increase inflation without it appearing in the official statistics.
Most monitors hit sRGB. Easily. Unless you're talking sub $100.
The differentiating factors today are high refresh rate or HDR where the DCI-P3 gamut is the gamut to hit.
sRGB is almost like expecting a car to have electric windows.
There's a HDR certification for displays where HDR 1000 is actually real HDR. https://displayhdr.org/