Now I am tempted to set the default branch to "offensive" or "inappropriate" :D
On a more serious note, I can agree that the master/slave terminology is not the best choice of words, but how is the usage of the word "master" in git deemed offensive?
On a more serious note, I can agree that the master/slave terminology is not the best choice of words, but how is the usage of the word "master" in git deemed offensive?
[0] The developer that chose git's default did not intentionally choose the default because it was Bitkeeper's default/terminology, but the developer was a Bitkeeper user at that time and its subconscious influence in reusing terminology would have been strong.