Am I the only one who finds this a little disturbing?
I mean the thing is beautifully produced, no doubt, I don't want to take anything away from the skills of the people who made it.
But the slickness moves it somehow from "scrappy bunch who gathered all the open data & collaboratively figured stuff out" into a different category. More like "someone with very deep pockets wants to tell me a particular story". Like getting the sort of 10-page glossy brochure they use to sell manhattan penthouses, but it's from the local animal shelter... and there's nothing wrong with the kitten pictures, the photography is excellent, but you wonder a bit who paid all those professionals, and why.
But carefully weighing evidence and doubt isn't exactly the core idea of the art world. You will win few prizes by pointing out factual mistakes in others' work. (Not saying I know of any factual inaccuracies here, to be clear.)
https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/police-bruta...
How did I not know about this before! :)
Bye-bye to getting any work done for the rest of the day!
Watching some of their video's, they seem to use Blender a lot. :)
Kind of like marketeers only trusting analytics and never talking to a single customer, but with an element of western arrogance on top of it.
Have a drone take Lidar or whatever model of an area, feed the pictures in and some other data and the system produces videos like this.
This video was incredible!