What's wrong with "love it or leave it"? That's choice and responsibility.
Jobs are created by people. If you think jobs should be different, create such jobs. Why should anybody else be obliged to do it for you?
Jobs are created by people. If you think jobs should be different, create such jobs. Why should anybody else be obliged to do it for you?
The conversation here is about people that take these moderation jobs (pick any of a dozen reasons) are getting shafted compared to the duties required.
Admittedly this is an attempt to shape their circumstances, but it's not in keeping with the way corporations work to suggest that workers can just say no.
It's a false dichotomy. I already told you, you don't live in a capitalist system. You live in a hybrid system where all markets and contracts are already regulated.
If you believe otherwise, try ignoring labor laws. Try ignoring OSHA. Try ignoring EPA. Try getting someone to sign an indentured servitude contract. You'll quickly learn that the world isn't that simple.
I don't know why you think "love it or leave it" is a veiled threat. What historical use are you referring to? Of course it is abbreviated. You can negotiate with your boss if you are unhappy. But ultimately, nobody owes you anything. Yes, there are the labor laws and so on, but I think if somebody decides to shut down their company, you can not really sue them for your job anymore.