So land it is, since we can both agree on it.

My thesis remains, that "real production value" does not exist, or at least is dwarfed by people "electing" a store of value. Like Tesla, gold or land.

Bitcoin seems to me uniquely suited to become the next store of value elected by the most.

If it does, even land might lose value compared to it.

Volatility might lessen over time, in any case is only a real problem if there is a long-term down trend. Else, just DCA in and out.

Of course, this is all hypothetical, no guarantees.