The title is at best misleading. They do not attack M. Schrems in Justice or even morally. They are the object of two complaints and they defend themselves invoking that privacy laws are not applicable as they are not directly processing data. This seems a perfectly valid argument. I'd be curious to understand in details their role in the process and see how courts will treat it.

Beyond privacy laws, there might be also allegation of fraud as their marketing campaigns seem to relies heavily on privacy and they seem to have a curious conception of it.