Normally this phase takes multiple years. You cannot shorten this. Long term effects, you guess it maybe, only show up in the long term.
You can have my dose, if you like. No problem for me. Please downvote me further.
It still does. That hasn't changed or been "rushed". We are now getting preliminary Phase 3 results and there will continue to be Phase 3 results for a long time to come. The question is, do various health agencies believe these initial results are sufficient for emergency approval?
But to be perfectly crystal clear, absolutely nothing has been "shortened".
That's obviously not true. The approval process has been shortened (or more accurately, is very likely to be shortened), even though the trials will continue after emergency approval.
That part can't be rushed. There was no shortcut to proving efficacy.
The Phase 3 trials haven't stopped and they will continue to record information about safety and side effects. But the Phase 2 trials already proved the vaccine to be safe, which is necessary before injecting it in to tens of thousands of human beings, as was done for Phase 3 trials.
New information about safety and side effects could emerge, but in the meantime, the various national health agencies will have to decide if the data on safety is sufficient to give emergency approvals.
This sentence implies that it is not possible for any unsafe condition to remain undetected until some time after the phase 2 trial is completed. Is that actually a claim you're making?
>the third testing phase, which normally takes multiple years, hasn't started yet
is apparently not correct. Only trying to enhance my knowledge of vaccine testing phases, I don't want to fight you and I'm not downvoting you.